“I Could Krushchev You”: 9 Shocking Allegations From the Don Blankenship Indictment

Twenty-nine workers were killed in Massey Energy’s mine. Its former CEO was indicted on Thursday.

Pete Marovich/Zuma


Former Massey Energy CEO Don Blankenship was indicted by a federal grand jury on Thursday, more than four years after an explosion at his company’s Upper Big Branch Mine killed 29 coal miners. The four-count indictment alleges that Blankenship “conspired to commit and cause routine violations of mandatory federal mine safety standards” in order to “produce more coal, avoid the costs of following safety laws, and make more money.” (Blankenship was also indicted for allegedly making false statements to the Securities and Exchange Commission.)

Blankenship, characteristically, is not backing down. In a statement, his attorney, William Taylor, said that “Mr. Blankenship is entirely innocent of these charges. He will fight them and he will be acquitted.” Taylor called Blankenship “a tireless advocate for mine safety” and argued the prosecution had been triggered by Blankenship’s “outspoken criticism of powerful bureaucrats.”

But the 43-page indictment tells a different story—in which Massey employees devised secret codes to thwart safety inspectors, and workers risked drowning while laboring in flooded mines that lacked even the minimum safety precautions.

Here are some allegations from the indictment:

The Upper Big Branch mine averaged nearly one safety violation a day: Between January 1, 2008, and April 9, 2010, the Upper Big Branch mine was cited “approximately 835 times for violations of mandatory federal mine safety and health standards.” That includes 283 “violations of the laws on mine ventilation, which operate to prevent explosions and fires in coal mines,” and 59 violations that required a part of the mine to be shut down. According to the indictment, “UBB ranked among the worst mines in the United States in such shutdown orders during the Indictment Period.”

Upper Big Branch was the company’s cash cow: Per the indictment, the Upper Big Branch mine group “generated revenues of approximately $331 million” in 2009—good for 14 percent of the company’s overall revenue and more than any other group of Massey mines.

The ceiling was literally falling down, and the company knew it:

Massey had a secret code to foil safety inspectors:

According to the indictment, “UBB employees frequently used code words and phrases when discussing imminent safety inspections on the mine telephone system.” The advance warning system allegedly had the support of UBB officials—and as a consequence, some portions of the mine could have as much as two hours to prepare for an on-site inspection. In at least one case, Blankenship himself allegedly encouraged advance warnings of inspections:

“We’ll worry about ventilation…at an appropriate time”:

Although Massey was cited for 283 separate violations of mine-ventilation standards, putting employees at risks of explosions, the indictment says Blankenship ordered his subordinates to “run some coal” instead of addressing ventilation issues:

Miners operated in flooded conditions:

According to the indictment, a Massey executive ordered workers to stop production on a necessary drainage system for a new mine project, so that they could extract more coal. As a result, workers were exposed to dangerous, flooded conditions:

Blankenship called mine-safety expenditures “literally crazy”:

In 2008, Blankenship allegedly sent a note to an Upper Big Branch official to instruct him not to spend so much of his resources on mine safety.

“I could Krushchev you”:

“children could run these mines better than you all do”:

In internal memos, according to the indictment, Blankenship pressured his subordinates to drive up their profit margins, sometimes complaining that they were too concerned with “construction” projects—like basic mine-safety improvements. In one memo, he wrote:

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate