The Ridiculously Simple Thing Businesses Can Do to Save Millions of Dollars (and Animals!)

Talk about low-hanging fruit.


James Yang

Have you ever looked up at a glowing city skyline and wondered, even though it’s pretty and all, why so many offices stay lit up all night long?

It’s hardly an idle question. According to the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, commercial buildings account for nearly a fifth of America’s energy use. A sizable portion of that energy—up to 43 percent for office buildings—goes toward lighting. That generates a collective bill of upward of $27.3 billion a year. In 2015, commercial structures were responsible for sucking up 258 billion kilowatt-­hours for lighting alone, creating the same planet-warming emissions as nearly 40 million cars.

The environmental concerns go beyond wasted energy: The glow is also not good for nocturnal critters. Over the past 50 years, cities have increased in brightness by an estimated 5 percent every year, drawing in rising numbers of night-migrating birds, disorienting them, and causing them to collide with buildings or circle to the point of exhaustion. A 2014 study estimated that as many as 1 billion birds die each year after hitting buildings. Artificial light can also prevent sea turtle hatchlings from finding their way to the surf line, and make it harder for prey animals to escape their predators, throwing off entire ecosystems. It can cause trees to bud early, leaving them more susceptible to frost damage. Yet “human beings imagine light as a really positive thing,” says Christopher Kyba, a physicist who studies light pollution at the German Research Centre for Geo­sciences. “It’s hard to imagine that it has any negative impacts.”

Federal and state governments offer tax breaks to some building owners who reduce their energy use, so flipping the switch off at night seems like a no-brainer. But it’s not that easy, says Luigi Polese, an engineer who works on energy at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Few office workers take it upon themselves to turn off the lights when they leave—and even in buildings that have light and motion sensors, the technology is notoriously wonky: They can turn off the lights if someone is standing still or working at a computer, so office managers often override the sensors. What’s more, some businesses intentionally leave lights on for security purposes (though the jury is out on whether this actually reduces crime). Cleaning crews remain in buildings well into the night, and more and more people are working nontraditional hours. Coordinating all those people is complicated, says Polese. “People don’t pay much attention to the fact that leaving lights on is wasting energy.”

A new smart sensor which senses workers’ locations and their activity levelscould cut building owners’ light bills in half.

Despite the challenges, there are some bright spots. In 1999, the National Audubon Society launched Lights Out, a program that highlights the dangers city lights pose to birds. Over the last 17 years, Audubon has dispatched volunteers in more than 20 cities to encourage building managers to dim or turn off nonessential nighttime lighting during peak migratory months. At the start of each migratory season, the group spreads the word to building owners that it’s time to dim the lights. Each morning, volunteers from a group called Chicago Bird Collision Monitors hit the sidewalks to collect birds killed or injured in the night. In Chicago, where Lights Out began, about 100 buildings have signed on, saving an estimated 10,000 birds annually in one neighborhood alone.

The International Dark-Sky Association has educated communities about the environmental and financial benefits of dimming skylines since 1988. Thanks in part to its efforts, at least 14 municipalities say they’ll reduce the use of night lights. And in France, home of the City of Light, a 2013 law is projected to save an estimated $220 million in electricity annually. New York City lawmakers are considering similar legislation to help the city achieve its goal of cutting emissions by 80 percent by 2050. Meanwhile, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo now requires 20 state government buildings to turn off outdoor lights at night during annual bird migration.

Following rules like that is about to get easier. In 2009, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory turned its attention to the problem of unnecessary night lighting. The result: a smart sensor the size of a stick of gum that goes beyond detecting motion—it can also tally how many people are in a room, their exact location, and their activity level. The NREL says the sensor, which is now in the licensing phase, could reduce lighting costs by more than half—a yearly savings of over $13 billion nationwide. That’s the kind of bright idea that just might dazzle reluctant building owners. “When you say you’re going to make things darker, that sounds really bad,” says Kyba, the physicist. But lights that know how to turn on when you need them and off when you don’t—now that’s appealing. “It’s entirely possible to have a comfortable, well-lit city that isn’t so bright.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate