August 29, 2017

The Pumpkin In Your Latte? It’s Supposed To Be There.

massonstock/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Pumpkin spice latte season is here, according to the drink’s official Twitter account (lol).

For years I have wondered in my mind, in my brain, why people like eating pumpkin-spiced lattes because pumpkin is disgusting. Have you ever eaten pumpkin? It’s disgusting. I had it once, as a youth, and it was disgusting and I have never had it again. Sure, pumpkin pie is popular with a certain sicko set, but I don’t know why they swallow that pie because pumpkin is disgusting. 

Every year in the run-up to Labor Day, the pumpkin-spiced latte craziness begins. People can be seen regularly running down the avenues shouting, “GIVE ME PUMPKIN-SPICED LATTES, I NEED THEM PLEASE GOD I NEED THEM. I’M NOT A VIOLENT PERSON BUT I WILL DO WHAT I HAVE TO DO TO GET THE PUMPKIN-SPICED LATTES I SO DESIRE. I HAVE A THIRST FOR BLOOD OR PUMPKIN-SPICED LATTES, AND ONE WAY OR ANOTHER IT WILL BE QUENCHED.”

But again, pumpkin, the orange thing children carve for Halloween, is yuckity-yuck. So, it’s like, why, brah? You dig?

(Sidenote: Even if we accept that you like pumpkin flavor for some weird emotional reason like you lost your virginity in a pumpkin patch or something, why would you only enjoy it in the early autumn? Why not have pumpkin-spiced lattes and everything else all the seasons of the year?)

So, anyway, I’m on the internet one day, very bright, merry, and gay, when I, in my own roundabout way, say, pumpkin-spice is disgusting.

And it starts slowly at first. Bop.

And then another bop. Bop bop.

Soon: bop bop bop bop bop bop.

and then we’re bopped out of the darkness into the light.

I thought, I can’t think why, that Starbucks would never lie. But boppity goddamn bop. Pumpkin spice is not pumpkin flavor.

It’s just like cloves, cinnamon, ginger, and nutmeg. So, that sounds pretty good, I’m thinking! And not disgusting, I’m thinking! “I look forward to ordering one,” I say to myself outloud. 

But, hold, stop, backtrack, buddy. This story isn’t over. That excitement in your belly? That thrill up your leg? That glint in your eye? Put a pin it it, my anti-pumpkin pumpkin-spice curious friend. 

Notice the dateline on that news story.

2014! I remember that year. That year was a friend of mine. This year is not that year. 2014 had Obama. 2017 has Trump. 2014 was an even number. 2017 is an odd number. 

The first rule of journalism is that time makes fake news of us all, and in doing the diligence that must be done this journalist found that the bop bop bops were false false false.

mphillips007 / Getty

I’m a pumpkin in 2017. (record scratch) I bet you’re wondering how I got here (in a latte). 

Starbucks Pumpkin Spice Latte Nutrition Facts /

Starbucks.com

In 2014, the pumpkin-hungry mobs of Outrageville shamed Starbucks to un-lie about their pumpkin-spiced lattes and beginning in 2015 “real pumpkin” was added to the pumpkin-spice latte.

Fact check: No pants on fire.

From the dawn of time Starbucks lied (bad) about there being pumpkin (disgusting) in pumpkin-spiced lattes (potentially good) but then in 2014 the internet (bad, destroyer of things) forced Starbucks (liar) to tell the truth (good) and so Starbucks (bastard) instead of changing the name of the pumpkin-spiced latte to more honestly represent its actual ingredients (good?) changed the very nature of the “pumpkin-spice” recipe (contaminated and thus bad). 

So to you, purchaser of things and drinker of drinks in 2017,  your pumpkin-spice latte is not even the pumpkin-spice latte you fell in love with that one autumn in 2003, your first semester away at college, when everything was new and exciting, and though you still love the pumpkin-spice latte it is only because you want to love the pumpkin-spice latte and, if we’re being quite real, it has more to do with you and where your mind is out and less to do with Starbucks and their pumpkin-spiced latte, which is now filled with disgusting actual pumpkin, a change that, according to this poorly formatted Yahoo Beauty story from 2015, did not even make the drink healthier. 

Have a nice day.

Don’t @ me.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate