Roundtable Review: Trouble the Water

<i>MoJo</i> staffers riff on a new Hurricane Katrina documentary about one Ninth Ward couple’s journey to higher ground—and back.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


A few days before Hurricane Katrina struck land in New Orleans three years ago Friday, 24-year-old rapper Kimberly Rivers Roberts bought a camcorder for $20 on the street. With her husband Scott, she started filming her neighbors—most of whom didn’t have the means to leave—and their preparations to ride out the storm. She kept filming until the levees failed, even as the water rose and her friends sought safety in their attics. Two weeks later, Kim and Scott returned to document the destruction, and join some 20 friends in the back of a truck to begin the long trip to dry land. Kim and Scott’s footage, along with archival materials including recovered recordings of 911 calls and video of inmates trapped in the Orleans Parish Prison, makes for a film that is at once journalistic and deeply personal.

Four MoJo staffers watched Trouble the Water Tuesday night and discussed it via Gchat Wednesday morning.

Kiera: First, a logistical question about the movie. How did Kim, Scott, and her friends get that truck that they drove away from New Orleans in? And what was their connection to the house they were staying in after the storm?

Nikki: Yeah, I found that distracting initially, but sort of forgot about logistics by the end. For me it didn’t detract.

Kiera: I almost think that sense of chaos was intentional.

Jesse: I would have liked to have seen what happened the night the police told them to stop filming on the one-year anniversary of the storm.

Nikki: Even more wrenching is that they seemed to see it coming. They weren’t surprised [that the police made them stop filming].

Daniel: That was sort of a theme.

Jesse: I also would have liked some resolution to the 911 rescue calls that were made during the hurricane. It would have been fascinating to track those calls and the people who made them.

Kiera: You guys wish any of the other people had been developed more?

Nikki: I liked that the filmmakers seemed more focused on this one couple’s story—they didn’t just focus on FEMA messing up or Bush messing up, which is the story you usually hear.

Daniel: And you got a sense of other people through their friends.

Jesse: The fact that it was Kim and Scott’s personal adventure made it an intimate experience—very much a home-video feeling.

Kiera: One of the devices in the film is the newscasts spliced into the home footage of people awaiting rescue. Impressions?

Daniel: I thought that was sort of amazing. The way [the newscasters] were all white and well dressed and so out of touch made it that much more intense.

Jesse: It created a nice dualism: This is what you see from your living rooms; this is what we see from our attics.

Nikki: Like the one where [newscaster] Julie Chen said something like, “All these people haven’t been saved, and also, how will gas prices be affected for everyone else?”

Jesse: I was struck by that gas-price line, too. On one hand, I thought, Wow, New Orleans is drowning and all we care about is a little bump in gas prices. But then I thought, Remember how confused everyone was in the aftermath? There was no good source for what was actually going on, and nobody really knew what the effects were going to be. And honestly, in some respect, gas prices was an appropriate story. It was just so harsh against the human suffering.

Kiera: That was some pretty heavy stuff, those juxtapositions. But the movie is being billed as uplifting.

Jesse: Uplifting? Not for me. Inspiring in these sense that it was so impressive what Kim and Scott were able to overcome.

Daniel: I had trouble with some of the music. It often was a little too connected to the scene, in a way that seemed a little trite. Like when they were waiting for their checks, and the lyrics of the song were like, “Waiting for my FEMA check, la-la-la.”

Kiera: Agreed. They hit us over the head sometimes.

Jesse: But when Kim found her recording [of her song “I’m Amazing”] and she started rapping—that was truly awesome.

Kiera: One thing I know: If ever there is a natural disaster, I want Kim on my team. But is anyone really that spunky all the time? Surely some meltdowns must have been edited out.

Jesse: I’m sure they worked it a little. But there’s no denying her energy.

Kiera: There was that one part when Scott is talking about how he stopped dealing drugs, and how the storm changed his perspective. Did that ring true for you guys?

Nikki: I think so. Even though both he and Kim were telling their stories on camera, I never got the sense they were saying anything for show.

Jesse: I can’t know that he didn’t go back to selling drugs at some point—but I don’t think that has much bearing on the truth of the feelings at this moment. I think what this moment shows is someone confronting and acknowledging his own failures.

Nikki: I woke up this morning with Kim’s “I’m Amazing” refrain in my head, which I think is a good sign.

Trouble the Water opened in select theaters on August 22.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate