Right-Wingers Outraged by Muppet Plot!

Fox Business and friends see a conspiracy in the new Muppet movie, leading to an inquisition (of sorts) online.

Right-wing paranoia has Muppets in the hot seat.Photo illustration by Dave Gilson

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Last month The Muppets opened in theaters nationwide, hotly anticipated as the Muppets’ first big-screen adventure in over a decade. Its kid-friendly, PG-rated storyline is all about love, laughter, camaraderie, looking out for the little guy, and finding your place in the world. In a season chock-full of dark and controversial Oscar bait, here’s an upbeat respite packed with delightful song-and-dance numbers, like this one:

 

How could anybody not enjoy this? I mean, no one could possibly get bent out of shape over The Muppets, right?

Right?

That was Fox Business host Eric Bolling on Friday accusing The Muppets‘ writers of dousing America’s children with anti-capitalist blood libel. With a straight face.

“Liberal Hollywood depicting a successful businessman as evil? That’s not new,” Bolling says in his introductory “aha!” moment. “Why do the kids need have to be exposed to this?” he continued. Guest commentator Andrea Tantaros later chimed in: “If you want to make [the movie’s message] fair, why not have a Barney Frank Muppet? Although Barney Frank looks like a Muppet, anyway…Tell me, why [is] being rich such a bad thing? Why [is] being successful such a bad thing?”

Conservatives are in a lather over the main villain, a sleazy, well-dressed oilman named Tex Richman, played by Chris Cooper, who wants to destroy the legendary Muppet Theater to drill for crude. They’d prefer an over-regulating congressman or a FEMA official to be the antagonist. It probably doesn’t help that Richman is the spitting image of libertarian satirist—and self-described “capitalist pig”—P.J. O’Rourke:

Cooper in "The Muppers," left, and O'Rourke at Cato.Cooper in The Muppets, left, and O’Rourke at the Cato Institute.

Let’s get this straightened out a bit: The Muppets is not The Battleship Potemkin. The movie isn’t even political; it’s a musical starring Jim Henson‘s Muppet characters written by the same guys who brought you Forgetting Sarah Marshall. But, hey, let’s give Bolling and Co. the benefit of the doubt and say they were just having an off-day. It’s not like an isolated incident like that constitutes a pattern of demonizing innocent, defenseless puppets, so why don’t we…Wait, what? Oh, come on!:

Take a minute to absorb that: The Fox News personality can’t understand why on earth this Muppet would be hungry when Barack Obama is in office. It is worth pointing out that this clip aired in October 2011, and not October 1793.

And here’s a Hannity segment that aired in June that elucidates how Sesame Street, a program filled with Henson’s creations, pushes the leftist agenda and the “soft bigotry of low expectations“:

So, yeah, there is some history behind last week’s Muppet panic. What these conservative pundits fail to grasp is this: The Muppets are political from time to time, but in a way that has nothing to do with subliminal brainwashing and everything to do with satire. Check out the cross-Atlantic, Cold War era spoofing in the “Robot Politician” sketch. In 2009, they received media attention for their friendly dig at Fox News (on Sesame Street, it’s “Pox News”). And in their spare time, the puppets also poke fun at pop-culture crazes. But any political content found in The Muppet Show or Sesame Street isn’t there to offend, brainwash, or surreptitiously infiltrate toddler culture. Like most of the shows’ material, it’s played up for giggles and cultural relevance, and it’s part of why this show has never been just for kids. Taking any of it too seriously—or perceiving Elmo or Kermit as some kind of Trotskyist threat—risks self-satire.

The Fox freak-out over Henson’s Muppets provoked a grand social media backlash this week. Here are some of the best tweets and other highlights:

(The Storify might take a few seconds to load.)

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate