What Choire Sicha Learned From His Year As a “Creepy Guy”

The Awl cofounder says his novel, which follows a group of struggling millenial New Yorkers, is “like ‘Girls’ meets Philip K. Dick.”

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


When he first landed in New York City, Choire Sicha—a 41-year-old Brooklynite whose rambunctious prose and mastery of digital media have earned him cult status among the web-obsessed—was just a broke and inexperienced kid. But he eventually caught a break, getting hired to edit Gawker during the news and gossip site’s early days, and returning as managing editor following a stint at the New York Observer. In 2009, after a subsequent gig at Radar dissolved, Sicha cofounded The Awl, a website that quickly became popular for its penetrating culture writing and dry wit. He also began researching his nonfiction debut. Out in August, Very Recent History follows a group of young New Yorkers struggling to pay rent and find love in the shadow of Wall Street’s collapse—a sort of gay male version of HBO’s Girls that mirrors Sicha’s own past exploits.

Mother Jones: Shall we talk about Girls?

Choire Sicha: You know, I’m supposed to have some way to explain my book, so I started saying it was like Girls meets Philip K. Dick, and everyone was like, “Oh, that sounds great! I have no idea what you mean.”

MJ: How did it come about?

CS: I wanted to make a book about what it was like to be young at that moment, so I found a bunch of people and started talking to them regularly. A number of them fell by the wayside. People are very hard to talk to and to have long, unfair, lopsided relationships with.

MJ: How much time did you spend with them?

CS: It ranged. I was as nosy as possible. The thing is, I don’t like being intrusive. I tend to probably be more sneaky.

MJ: Sneaky how?

CS: Like, “Hey, can I come look through all your mail?” And then, you know, just sort of being the creepy guy hanging out and listening.

MJ: Well, you have an excuse to be following that person, or mining through their life.

“We complain how the millennials are lazy or spoiled, but they’re incredibly articulate and intelligent.”

CS: At least I’m not a gross, pointless stalker.

MJ: What about this book as a point of projection?

CS: As someone who has been young, and lived in New York when I was young, and made 600 dollars a month when I moved here. I wasn’t prepared for the world of work—I didn’t go to college, I didn’t have a lot of marketable skills or experience. I think Barbara Ehrenreich talks about that a lot, too. The ways I acted out when I was 25 and the ways I had to suppress the things going on around me when I was 25 were substantial.

MJ: Everyone you followed seems to be cheating on whomever they’re with, and borrowing money all the time.

CS: I think some people will read this book and be like, “Oh, these kids are horrifying and they need to be put down.” I just can’t judge, because I was just as bad.

MJ: I liked the part where everyone is discussing Truman Capote’s article about hanging out with Montgomery Clift.

CS: We complain how the millennials are lazy or spoiled, but they’re incredibly articulate and intelligent. They’re constantly reading and writing and communicating in a way that my generation never got to. I mean, we had zines. Zines were narcissistic, egotistical, one-sided publications!

MJ: How’d you land at Gawker?

CS: They sort of knew me because I was blogging. I mean, the job paid $24,000 a year. It’s not like they were like, “Let’s find someone from the Times.”

MJ: Gawker obviously struck a nerve.

CS: There was an element of terror involved. People would email me, being like, “Please get my name off of there!”

MJ: The Awl is totally different. What compelled you to start it?

“People should write books like Woody Allen does movies: We should all put out a little book every year and not spend too much time on it.”

CS: It was 2009! Not a job to be had.

MJ: But The Awl‘s been successful?

CS: In its own funny way. We just hired a CTO, so it’s growing up. It’s a weird company, but we have a good time.

MJ: You’re an avid reader.

CS: I read a lot. Mostly science fiction.

MJ: Do you have any interest in writing fiction, or science fiction?

CS: I’ve written a couple science-fiction stories and I keep submitting them to people, and they’re literally like, “No. Pass.” I work a lot, I write a lot, and to be submitting to journals that I’ve never heard of that maybe have 2,000 subscribers and having them be like, “Get lost!” It’s good for me.

MJ: Think you’ll write more books?

CS: I think people should write books like Woody Allen does movies: We should all put out a little book every year and not spend too much time on it. Capitalistically speaking, it’s a worthless endeavor. A couple of them make a lot of money, and a couple of them [publishers] get regard for publishing. The rest is sort of like gambling.


If you buy a book using a Bookshop link on this page, a small share of the proceeds supports our journalism.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate