This Damning Report Just Might Get Russia Banned From the Olympics

A new investigation found Russia’s sports ministry “directed, controlled, and oversaw” a doping scheme in Sochi.

Matt Dunham/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Update, July 19, 11:51 p.m. ET: One day after it vowed to take the “toughest sanctions available,” the International Olympic Committee announced on Tuesday it would explore “legal options” in determining whether to ban all Russian athletes from the Rio Olympics. The committee planned to retest Russian athletes who participated in the 2014 winter games in Sochi, Russia as part of a follow-up investigation. It also refused to organize future sporting events in Russia and to grant accreditation to anyone implicated in the independent investigation.  

The World Anti-Doping Agency endorsed barring Russian athletes from international competitions—including next month’s Rio Olympics—on Monday in response to a damning independent investigation that confirmed the operation of a widespread, state-sanctioned doping program during the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia, and beyond.

The 97-page report, released 18 days before the Olympics’ opening ceremony, found that Russia’s Ministry of Sport “directed, controlled, and oversaw the manipulation of athletes’ analytical results and sample swapping.” It details how the state oversaw systematic cheating in 30 sports since 2011.

The report, prepared by independent investigator Richard McLaren, also found the following:

  • Russia’s security agents broke into the Sochi Olympic laboratory overnight to swap specific athletes’ tamper-proof bottles of dirty urine with clean urine. How the authorities opened the sample bottles is unknown, though McLaren’s investigation found a way to remove caps from the bottles “without any evidence visible to the untrained eye.”
  • Russia’s top athletes used a cocktail of oral turinabol, oxandrolone, and methasterone dissolved in alcohol that was “swished in the mouth…and then spit out” to avoid detection.
  • The doping program, described by McLaren as the “disappearing positive methodology,” resulted in at least 312 falsified results from late 2011 to 2015.
  • The report concluded that “beyond a reasonable doubt that this was the modus operandi of State directed oversight and control of the Moscow Laboratory anti-doping operational system.”

Thomas Bach, president of the International Olympic Committee, told reporters Monday that the report represented “a shocking and unprecedented attack on the integrity of sports and on the Olympic Games.” The IOC will announce “provisional measures and sanctions” at a phone conference on Tuesday.

Russian President Vladimir Putin said in a statement Monday that the investigation reflected “a dangerous recurrence of politics interfering in sport.” He added that the officials named in the report will be suspended pending an internal investigation.

In May, the New York Times and 60 Minutes first reported on the doping scheme after scoring interviews with Grigory Rodchenkov, former head of Russia’s anti-doping lab in Moscow, and Vitaly Stepanov, who once worked with the Russian Anti-Doping Agency. Rodchenkov told the Times that he covered up performance-enhancing, drug-tainted urine samples for dozens of Russian athletes during the Sochi Winter Olympics under order from Russian authorities. The Moscow lab lost its accreditation on April 15.

In June, the International Association of Athletics Federations unanimously voted to ban Russia’s track and field athletes from competition after initial reports outlined a systemic doping scheme. And this past weekend, a draft of a letter from several anti-doping agencies, including the US Anti-Doping Agency, leaked to the media; it asked the IOC to ban Russian athletes from this year’s games.

Read the McLaren report below:

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate