This Is What Happens When Big Food Gets Cozy With Nutritionists

In this week’s BITE, a nutritionist explains the difference between marketing schemes and actual science.

<a href=http://www.shutterstock.com/cat.mhtml?lang=en&language=en&ref_site=photo&search_source=search_form&version=llv1&anyorall=all&safesearch=1&use_local_boost=1&autocomplete_id=&search_tracking_id=-ZnhDaQirTd-BFq68MnFkA&searchterm=corporate%20food&show_color_wheel=1&orient=&commercial_ok=&media_type=images&search_cat=&searchtermx=&photographer_name=&people_gender=&people_age=&people_ethnicity=&people_number=&color=&page=1&inline=309322517>katueng</a>Shutterstock

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Another episode of Bite, our food politics podcast, is out today and available for download. You can find it along with our previous episodes here, or by subscribing in iTunes, Stitcher, or via RSS.

Andy Bellatti Photo courtesy of andybellatti.com
 

It’s hard to trust nutritionists when they’re in cahoots with corporations, and it happens more often than you think. McDonald’s catered and sponsored a statewide nutritionists’ convention in California in 2014. Last year, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics put the first “Kids Eat Right” seal on Kraft Singles, the American cheese snack that isn’t more than 51 percent real cheese. The Academy and Kraft Foods have a three-year partnership.

Although the corporate influence on our daily diets seems inescapable, nutritionists like Andy Bellatti’s aim to fight it. A former student of New York University’s Marion Nestle, the author of Food Politics, Bellatti wrote the blog Small Bites for six years before becoming an expert voice on corporate sponsorship of nutrition. He is the founder of the Dietitians for Professional Integrity and this week’s guest on Bite, where he unpacks instances when nutrition science has blurred with food marketing.

 

Bellatti isn’t just after the big guys. He has appeared on HuffPo and in the Chicago Tribune. He’s dispelled myths about tryptophan for Life Hacker, Bulletproof coffee for Food Navigator, and bone broth for Mother Jones. Other diet trends that drive Bellatti bonkers? Liquid juice meals, organic Gatorade, and Sun Chips.

“PepsiCo sells [Sun Chips] as if it were a health elixir just because they have three grams of fiber in them,” Bellatti tells Bite host Kiera Butler. “It’s still a chip—there’s nothing particularly healthy about them.”

But it’s not all bad. When it comes to Paleo, the most-Googled diet of 2013 that promotes eating like our cavemen ancestors, Bellatti says there’s at least one positive takeaway: It promotes whole, real foods. On the other hand, that doesn’t absolve it from other problems, especially its focus on protein. Hearkening back to the Atkins diet and its promotion of protein-laden meals, we’re getting too concerned with not getting enough of something that is literally in every food, Bellatti says. And in doing so, we often ignore other ingredients that are added in.

“Just because a protein bar has, you know, 30 grams of protein, you’re supposed to ignore the sugar content, which is ridiculous,” Bellatti says.

“It’s still a chip, there’s nothing particularly healthy about them.”

But diet trends do help us see foods in a new light. One example is cereal: Traditionally thought of as a healthy staple of the American breakfast, the food has decreased in sales as people have grown more concerned about carbohydrates and added sugar. This is good news for Bellatti, since he considers cereal to be “low-fat cookies with vitamins sprinkled on.” (Here’s more on just how much sugar is in your favorite kid cereal.)

Whether you’re a fan of fast food, a kale-loving vegan, a Paleo follower, or a drunk-a-tarian like this chef, you’ll want to listen to this week’s episode to learn more about the tricky ways food marketing gets disguised as science.

Show Notes

  • Tom Philpott gives his follow-up on smoothies: Is your green drink something you should worry about?
  • How one poultry company is creating an environment where “chickens can act like chickens”
  • The tasty, late-night treat Andy Bellatti whips up in less than one minute
  • Maddie Oatman makes pancakes with just two ingredients.
  • Want to stay up-to-date on food politics? Follow Bite on Twitter for the latest.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate