The Eloquent Angst of Titus Andronicus

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mehan/5025201572/">Mehan Jayasuriya</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


A couple of weeks back, Titus Andronicus opened for Okkervil River at Oakland’s Fox Theater, but based on the kids going wild up front, you would have thought Titus was the headliner.

After the musicians calmly took the stage, a bandana-clad audience member shouted, “Titus, fuck yeah!” Taking the cue, front man Patrick Stickles turned to his bandmates: “All right, let’s do this.” And the show exploded into the angry, anthemic, and melodic punk energy of “A More Perfect Union,” the opening track of the band’s Civil War-themed album, The Monitor.

When Titus played “No Future Part Three: Escape From No Future” for the third song, Stickles wailed over and over like a record stuck on repeat, “You will always be a loser.” Coming from another band, that line might sound like an insult. But when Stickles sings it, you can empathize with him—he’s saying “you,” but he could just as easily be staring into a mirror and singing it to himself. 

The recently restored Fox is one of those gorgeous, over-the-top movie palaces built in the late 1920s. Standing underneath its opulently carved wooden ceiling and facing its gilded stage guarded on either side by towering Hindu deities with glowing green eyes, it feels a little too clean and luxurious for a punk show. The atmosphere did, however, lend a hallowed air to the performance. And when Stickles sang—or howled, or ranted—about living in fear, the demise of our species, and urinating from the top of a metaphorical mountain, every word and chord felt beautiful and real. As the band drove its van on to San Diego, another stop on its national tour, Stickles told me about how the band got its name and where some of his prodigious angst emanates from.

Mother Jones: You guys must get asked this a lot, but how did you come to be called Titus Andronicus? It’s a bloody Shakespearen tragedy… Are you Shakespeare buffs? Or were you just into the 16th century precursor to today’s horror porn?

Patrick Stickles: I used to be a buff back in high school, but not as much of one anymore. It doesn’t really have anything to do with anything… It’s just a name. Like the guy said, ‘What’s in a name?’ We had to be called something. With the horror porno element, you’re right that Titus Andronicus occupies an interesting nexus, considering it’s schlocky and extreme entertainment, but it’s also part of the canon. It’s like the interception between the carnal and the cerebral urges, and that’s where all the good rock and roll happens, in my estimation. But again, that wasn’t why it was chosen. That was decided after the fact so I would have something to say when people asked me about the name.

MJ: There’s a lot of darkness in your lyrics. Who writes them, and how?

PS: I handle that duty. The process is to just go around and wait for the synapses to fire in the right direction.

MJ: What kinds of things inspire you to write? Are your lyrics personal, or do you write from a more general perspective?

PS: No, I just write exclusively about myself. That’s really the only thing on this Earth that I’m an expert on—my experiences. Trying to talk about anything else would just be talking out of my ass.

MJ: Some of your songs, like “Joset of Nazareth” or “A More Perfect Union” have religious references. Where do these references come from?

PS: I was raised that way; my family is pretty serious Catholics. It’s not something I really fuck with anymore, but it was a huge part of my upbringing. It informed a lot of my vocabulary and framed a lot of stuff with those sorts of images. I guess it’s just the guilt, the dread that at any moment, I could be struck by lightning. Or that even though I feel like I’m doing my best to be a good guy, I still might actually be an asshole, and I’m going to burn for all eternity for failure to love properly. It’s just that dread of some kind of executioner looming over me… I guess that would be the big contribution of Catholicism to our lyrical canon.

“Even though I’m not scared that God is going to actually appear and send me to Hell, that’s just part of how my brain’s wired now.”

MJ: So is this a real fear?

PS: No, that’s silliness. But I shouldn’t say that it’s silly. It means a lot for a lot of people I respect, even if it’s not for me. But it’s in my brain—that feeling of dread. Even though I’m not scared that God is going to actually appear and send me to Hell, that’s just part of how my brain’s wired now. I can’t help but feel a sickening dread of the possible consequences of even my most innocuous actions. It’s like a Pavlovian response to having any kind of fun.

MJ: Would you ever sell your songs to be used in commercials?

PS: Definitely not. This sneaker company was trying to trick us into getting their hands on our music. We told them to go to hell! But sometimes we play at festivals, and this same sneaker company is there, and we accept the sneakers they give out. Do you think that’s a conflict? [Laughs.]

MJ: Why are you against selling your songs for commercials?

PS: Because the song is an end to itself. The song isn’t there to get you to do some other crap that you don’t even want to. And besides, one shoe is as much the same as another, right?

MJ: Well, some might disagree.

PS: Yeah, but those people have been hoodwinked and bamboozled by the advertisers into thinking that one kind of shoe will make you cool. My dad recently was scolding me because he heard that we refused a good bit of money from a soda company. He was like, “Isn’t that kind of a hip, happenin’ soda?” Get real Dad! There’s no such thing as a hip soda.

MJ: Speaking of hip, I heard this tall, lanky teenager in the crowd at the Fox tell his friends that you’re “inspirational” to him because you’re also a tall, lanky dude, and he sees photos of you in Rolling Stone. What do you think about that?

PS: Dude, that’s cool. I got love for all my tall lanky boys. We want them to see us and recognize that we’re just like them. I can remember what a powerful thing that was to realize, when I was their age. Just breaking down that fourth wall and showing that creative people are just regular people.

MJ: Have you heard of an elevator pitch? What would Titus Andronicus’s elevator pitch to Mother Jones readers be?

PS: Fuck, how long do I have? I don’t know. We’re a punk rock band. We’re just trying to keep it real and show them we’re regular folks just like they are, and our feelings and experiences are valid. Together we can celebrate life and all of its joy and sorrows.

 

 

Click here for more music features from Mother Jones.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate