December 19, 2011

7 Christmas Songs That Don’t Suck

Mr. Claus was not about to peaceably accept the onslaught of terrible seasonal pop songs played in his honor. The cops drew the line at public urination, though.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/12836528@N00/3124443099/">Kevin Dooley</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

By now, it’s almost impossible to remember a time when local radio stations weren’t blasting Christmas/winter/secular-Santa music 24/7. You’ve probably heard the holiday stylings of Mariah Carey, Wham!, Miley Cyrus, Alvin and the Chipmunks, and Gene Autry enough times in the past few weeks to recall the lyrics as well as you would your mother’s maiden name.

And to get you through the remainder of the holiday blitz, here are seven Christmas songs that don’t in fact suck. We’ve got Ike & Tina Turner, John Lennon, and oddball community college students from that NBC sitcom nobody watches. In the event that you are seeking more diversity in terms of musical epochs, many apologies in advance for most of these songs being of a “classic” variety. (Kings of Leon probably could’ve come up with a pretty sweet contemporary Xmas jingle, but it just so happens that they find the holiday hugely “depressing.”)

1. James Brown, “Please Come Home for Christmas”: This 1960 blues song by Charles Brown has been covered to death: Aaron Neville, Willie Nelson, Bon Jovi, the Eagles. But the Hardest Working Man in Show Business recorded the most tastefully ragged version. (As his final act of impeccable style, the Godfather of Soul died on Christmas Day 2006.)

2. The cast of NBC’s Community, “Baby Boomer Santa”: Glee aired this Christmas episode in 2011. And this Christmas episode of Community that spends 21 minutes tearing into Glee is way, way better. “Regional Holiday Music” features six original songs (see here, here, and here), but the genre-shifting “Baby Boomer Santa” holds up best after repeat listens.

The song posits that Jolly Ol’ St. Nick was responsible for everything in the second half of the 20th century, from fake butter to the Iron Curtain. Here’s a taste of the beautifully nonsensical lyrics: “Santa fought at Woodstock and Vietnam/And smoked a ton of acid and burnt his bra!”

3. John Lennon, “Happy Xmas (War Is Over)”: Lennon recorded this anti-Vietnam War song with the Plastic Ono Band and the Harlem Community Choir in 1971. With the official end to the American war effort in Iraq, and with the holiday homecoming of servicemembers, the song takes on a whole new meaning.

4. Ike & Tina Turner, “Merry Christmas Baby”: Here’s another blues and R&B Christmastime staple, which has been performed by every artist from B.B. King to (ugh) Hanson. With the possible exception of Otis Redding, Ike & Tina Turner cranked out the best rendition. The duo’s patented gospel-stomp and funk edge are on full display here:

5. Keith Richards, “Run Rudolph Run”: For his inaugural single as a solo artist, the Rolling Stones guitar player swaggered-out his take on the Chuck Berry Christmas classic. This is from way back in 1978, when Richards’ youthful howl was firmly intact.

6. Bruce Springsteen and the E Street Band, “Santa Claus Is Coming to Town”: You’ve heard the song at least 8 trillion times since you were born. The Boss somehow managed to make it cool. When Springsteen headlined Bonnaroo in June 2009, attendees pleaded with him to perform it, to which he replied, “It’s too fucking hot for Santa.” And then the band played it anyway, never minding the season or temperature.

Here’s concert footage from 2007:

7. George Thorogood and the Destroyers, “Rock and Roll Christmas”: This video is really cheesy…and also perversely captivating. Don’t ask questions; just go with it.

Please recommend your favorite Christmas (or Hanukkah, Boxing Day, and Kwanzaa) songs in the comments section.

Have awesome holidays, MoJo readers, and remember to check out more music features—interviews, playlists, concert reviews, and much more—from Mother Jones.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate