Real Time With Built to Spill’s Doug Martsch

Martsch is the one with the hat.photo by Autumn DeWilde

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Doug Martsch doesn’t like to make much of his band, a “little-known” outfit called Built to Spill that since the early 1990s has spawned an entire subgenre of idyllic-yet-grungy indie rock (think no-longer-just-a-college-band bigwigs Modest Mouse). Since 1994’s There’s Nothing Wrong With Love (ranked #24 on Pitchfork’s “Top 100 Albums of the 1990s”) the band’s unique mix of intricate guitar solos, stringy vocals, and starkly simple but hard-hitting lyrics have earned them a devoted, though never very huge, following. This week, they are headed down the Pacific coast from Boise for a small tour before getting started on recording a new album, the band’s first since 2009’s There is No Enemy. Last week, Martsch, Built to Spill’s famously reticent front man, regaled me with his thoughts on festival crowds, interview hazards, and the unexpected rewards of judging a record by its cover. (For the initiated, I tossed in clips of a few BTS favorites.)

Mother Jones: Any idea what the new album is going to sound like?

Doug MartschNah, not really. Whenever we start a record it’s pretty much just a batch of things we’ve stumbled across from jamming or playing guitar. It’s pretty much just a hodgepodge right now.

MJ: Giant music festivals have really proliferated over the past decade. What’s it like for you playing to these massive party crowds as opposed to just dedicated fans?

DM: I think it’s pretty nice actually. We’re lucky because we do play a lot of shows where people are into it and know our music and stuff. It’s kind of interesting and fun to play for people who are just sorta walking by, going to get something to eat, and sort of checking you out for a minute and having no idea what you’re all about.


MJ: Built to Spill is known for keeping a pretty low profile. During shows, there are no theatrics, and maybe just a few unassuming thank you’s between songs. Do you have an aversion to showmanship?

DM: Oh, I think that’s maybe because when I was growing up, I really liked punk rock. I liked the sort of people that played really powerful music that was pretty unassuming otherwise—people who didn’t dress weird or do much theatrics. But I definitely have an appreciation for that stuff, and I guess I could’ve just as easily been more influenced by something else and gone in a totally different direction. I think when I was younger I would’ve tried to do more weird shit, but it’s too much effort for me right now to be that creative.

MJ: In a 1997 interview, you called electronic music “a complete fabrication by the music industry.” Do you still feel that way?

DM: I think that my quote is really stupid, because I don’t think that at all, I don’t know why I said that. That’s one of those hazards of an interview: You get tired of your stock answer and you try to get creative and even play devil’s advocate. I don’t really care, though. If people like electronic music, then great—let that be the next thing. I don’t think I ever really will, but there’s plenty of records for me to go buy.

MJ: You’ve also mentioned that you like to jam, which begs the question: How do you feel about jam bands?

DM:  Yeah, hmm, I don’t really get them much. I like simpler things, more visceral kinds of music.

MJ: A couple of years ago you were on a pretty big blues kick, and even did a solo blues album. Are you still into it?

DM: I kind of made that record and stopped playing that stuff. I have a radio show, but I usually play a lot of things that I liked when I was younger or when I was in high school, when I listened to a lot of soul and reggae music. And then here and there people turn me on to some classic rock or punk rock that I just missed when I was younger. But I don’t listen to a ton of music other than putting my show together, just because my lifestyle isn’t too conducive to listening to music all the time. I like to watch basketball, and I would rather not listen to music while I’m doing that.

MJ: You’ve cited Dinosaur Jr.’s J Mascis as a huge influence on your music. Do you remember where you were when you first heard them?

DM: Ha-ha, yeah! Someone loaned me You’re Living All Over Me. It was right after I graduated from high school. To be honest, I didn’t really like it all that much at first, but I’d just gotten a record player—I’d listened to cassettes for years—so I had like 10 records total. That was back in the days too when I had a lot of music that wasn’t that good but I had to listen to it because I’d spent my allowance on it. I couldn’t really get access to tons of stuff, so I kind of had to take a chance judging by the record cover or name. So I was way more disciplined and if I didn’t like something I’d still listen to it a bunch of times. That record was like that. But then I learned those were the most rewarding records, the ones that took a few listens to get into.

Click here for more music features from Mother Jones.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate