Steve Carell: Serial Young Lady Sexer?

Ahh, yeeeeeaaahh.Photo courtesy of Focus Features

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Seeking a Friend for the End of the World
Focus Features
101 minutes

Seeking a Friend for the End of the World is a lovely little film—one that’s painfully funny, and drenched in rich metaphor. The premise is admirably gimmicky: With an Armageddon-size asteroid barrelling towards earth, human civilization is coming to an end in a few weeks. As expected, people the world over start panicking like wild animals. They loot, riot, and of course surrender themselves to nihilistic hedonism (feeding martinis to their toddler kids, injecting heroin at will, drunken orgies daily—basically, partying like they all just got back to Berlin after the Great War).

Dodge (played by Steve Carell), on the other hand, gets sedated and very, very mopey. So does Penny (Keira Knightley), Dodge’s neighbor. In the midst of all the oh-shit-the-world’s-coming-to-an-end commotion, the two strangers forge an unlikely bond, flee the city in Penny’s Prius, and go on an adventure looking for Dodge’s old flame. Thus kicks off their surprising road trip, set against the darkly humorous backdrop of imminent apocalypse.

Seeking a Friend serves as a welcome reminder that—during the summer season dominated by the big, the noisy, and the expensively high-tech—smaller, tender films can still stick the landing, while also maintaining a commercially accessible edge. The chemistry between Carell and Knightley is undeniable. The soundtrack is fantastic. The story is big on sentiment, and thankfully low on sap. And the movie—written and directed by Lorene Scafaria, the woman behind 2008’s Nick and Norah’s Infinite Playlist—has indie cred coming out of its ears. Hell, even the title is too cool for school (presumably taken from the chorus of “Preaching the End of the World,” an achingly beautiful song from Chris Cornell’s album Euphoria Morning). [Spoiler to follow.]

That stuff is great and all, but Dodge also gets to have sex with Penny in a car in public. Which calls to mind a question: What’s up with the recent trend of Steve Carell movies in which his character makes sweet, ardent love to a woman decades his junior? (The actor turns 50 in August.)

Here’s my running list. It’s uncanny, really:

  • Get Smart (2008): Anne Hathaway, who was 24 years old when principal photography began.
  • Crazy, Stupid, Love. (2011): There were multiple 20-something conquests, actually, presented in a montage that shows Carell’s middle-aged character seducing eight different women for one-night-stand action. Furthermore, a girl who’s barely old enough to sit at the grown ups’ table on Thanksgiving (played by model/figure skater/actress Analeigh Tipton) tries to lure him into bed with a whole bunch of naked photos. So there’s that.
  • Seeking a Friend for the End of the World (2012): Keira Knightley. In case you don’t remember who Keira Knightley is, she is one of the world’s most winsome atheists. She was 26 at the time of filming. Also, she is Keira Knightley.
  • The 40 Year Old Virgin (2005): Well, this one technically doesn’t count, since he gets several opportunities, but passes on each one. (He ends up saving himself for the beautiful, appropriately aged Catherine Keener.) For the record, though, some of the much younger ladies in this movie come at him hard.

So what gives? Is there a my-love-interest-must-be-way-younger clause stipulated in his contract, or something? I asked Lorene Scafaria, the film’s writer/director. Here’s what she had to say:

He often can’t believe who he’s playing opposite. He’s often phrased it like, “How dare I get to kiss Marisa Tomei or Keira Knightley!?” [The trend is] unfortunately not on purpose, and he probably wants to crawl out of his skin thinking about it. But nevertheless…lucky man!

So there you have it: In spite of all evidence to the contrary, Steve Carell probably doesn’t have a special midlife-crisis clause in his contract. I’ll update this post if any evidence suggesting otherwise emerges.

In the meantime, here’s a clip of actress Gillian Jacobs (Britta Perry in Community) “rollin’ pretty hard,” with major cocaine eyes, during a restaurant scene with Knightley and Carell in Seeking a Friend. Like many others in this film, it’s a keeper:

Seeking a Friend for the End of the World gets a wide release on Friday, June 22. The film is rated R for language including sexual references, some drug use and brief violence. Click here to get local showtimes and tickets.

Click here for more movie and TV features from Mother Jones. To read more of Asawin’s reviews, click here.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate