“Revolution” on NBC Introduces The Obama-Morpheus Tyrant

Courtesy of NBC Universal

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In the first ten minutes of NBC’s new sci-fi drama Revolution (premiering Monday, September 17 at 10 p.m. EDT), we meet the villain: Captain Tom Neville, played by Giancarlo Esposito. He is a 6-feet-tall, light-skinned, half-black militiaman of the Monroe Republic. He rides into town imposingly atop a large horse, accompanied by a pack of angry bodyguards brandishing rifles. Neville wears a trenchcoat, dark sunglasses, and a pistol at his hip—he calls to mind a slimmer Morpheus from the Matrix franchise. He is charismatic and composed, and speaks in a rich baritone. The village folk (dozens of good-looking white people) look on in trepidation.

At first glance, you may feel inclined—as I was—to think, “say, that Captain Neville looks and sounds an awful lot like Barack Obama, now, doesn’t he?” only to have your nagging liberal guilt kick in, thus batting away such a mildly racist assumption.

Phew! You’ve dodged a mildly racist bullet, so it seems!

NBCNBCBut then Neville starts talking to the white townsfolk about taxesburdensome taxes—that are owed to the Monroe dictatorship. He reinforms them that for civilians “owning a firearm is a federal offense.” He threatens to “reeducate” their children if his demands aren’t met. And then, faster than you can say “Hussein,” Neville and his crew begin terrorizing and decimating the assembly of benevolent, over-regulated white folk!

By now this should really be reminding you of someone—or at least the acute right-wing spin on the administration of a certain someone.

And so it was that on September 17, 2012, NBC introduced the Obama-Morpheus Tyrant.

(Alyssa Rosenberg, critic at ThinkProgress (and my podcast buddy), has more on the despotic Morpheus-Barack here.)

Whether these, uh, parallels are intentional or not is unclear; cast and crew insist that the show draws inspiration from the American Revolution, not the tea party or Alex Jones. Whatever its intended take on modern American politics (that is, if it actually has one), the pilot episode of Revolution is a commendably decent hour of television that does just fine without the hassle of partisan overanalysis.

I won’t get too deep into the weeds of the largely implausible premise. The “post-apocalyptic” action-thriller is the latest offering from TV mega-producer J. J. Abrams, from a script by Supernatural creator Eric Kripke. For some horrible reason, all the world’s electricity goes out. Governments crumble, warlords and competing militias take over. Every country on the planet becomes Somalia but without any air conditioning.

Revolution focuses on a ragtag group led by ex-Marine Miles Matheson (Billy Burke) and his gutsy niece Charlotte (Tracy Spiridakos). Miles is good with swords, small arms, and at waxing Han Solo. Tracy (a knock-off The Hunger Games’ Katniss) kills things with her crossbow. They may or may not hold the key to rebooting the world’s power. So, the militia dudes hunt them.

The last time NBC tried to pull off something this ambitious, this demanding of long-term viewing, we got The Event two years ago—and that went south at lightning speed. But at least for its inaugural hour, Revolution—ridiculous premise included—is staged better than it has any right to be, is better acted than it has any right to be, has sharper dialogue than it has any right to contain, and is far more engaging than what we’ve come to reasonably expect from NBC’s 10 p.m. time slot.

The pilot was directed by the gifted Jon Favreau, who helmed the Iron Man movies. Thanks to his knack for kinetic energy and pacing, the melees and PG-13-grade bloodletting are choreographed and shot with just the right amount of discipline. Spiridakos is surprisingly adept and convincing as rebellious pseudo-Katniss, and Esposito nails the cold charm that defines Neville.

Usual caveats: NBC has a well-practiced habit of tanking good ideas quickly. But for now, Revolution has a fighting chance.

Come for the stunning chutzpah of the gleefully authoritarian Morpheus-Barack; stay for the intriguing goods.

Check out this TV spot:

Click here for more TV and movie features from Mother Jones.

To read more of Asawin’s reviews, click here.

To listen to the weekly movie and pop-culture podcast that Asawin co-hosts with ThinkProgress critic Alyssa Rosenberg, click here.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate