“Elysium”: Matt Damon Shoots His Way to Universal Health Care

#OCCUPY.Courtesy of Sony Pictures

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Elysium
TriStar Pictures
109 minutes

Elysium doesn’t have a message,” Neill Blomkamp, the film’s writer/director, told Wired recently. The South African-Canadian filmmaker (famous for Academy Award Best Picture nominee District 9) also discussed how he wasn’t a fan of people drawing parallels between the Occupy movement and his new movie.

“It’s not just hypocritical to say this movie isn’t political, it’s hilarious,” Dan Gainor of the conservative Media Research Center told Fox News in response. “This is just the latest of several Hollywood movies this year to try and co-opt Occupy Wall Street plotlines into their films.” Other right-leaning observers have voiced similar sentiments. Big Hollywood, Breitbart.com’s pop-culture wing, has been rooting for the film to fail. Newsmax has dubbed the film, “Matt Damon’s Sci-Fi Socialism” and “heavy-handed political propaganda.”

Some of the conservative hate directed at Elysium‘s political content, real and imagined, is (as you can guess) a bit much. However, it’s odd that Blomkamp would claim his film does not have a “message.” His sci-fi action flick is explicitly and pervasively political. It gets its two cents in on global poverty, immigration, access to health care, and social mobility, all the while affording Matt Damon plenty of room to maim and explode bad guys.

The movie takes places in the year 2154, a future in which all of Earth’s civilizations look as broken as Somalia. The planet has been wrecked by pollution, disease, and overpopulation, and the wealthiest and most politically powerful of humankind have retreated to Elysium, a decadent space station where every rich person owns a tanning bed that can cure practically all illness and repair every organ and body part. The Earth’s poor aren’t allowed access to these medically magical tanning beds, and suffer and die in large numbers. (Attempts to illegally fly to Elysium are typically met with plutocratic missile fire.)

Damon (in a role once meant for rapper Eminem) plays Max DeCosta, one of the future’s great unwashed. DeCosta—carrying gigantic weapons and wearing a high-tech, steel exoskeleton—becomes the accidental hero in a righteously violent, pro-universal health care revolution that alters the course of human history. One obstacle to a glorious proletarian victory is Agent Kruger (Sharlto Copley, star of District 9 and Spike Lee’s upcoming Oldboy remake), a rogue government operative who commits human rights abuses and rape like it’s his day job. Another obstacle is Delacourt (Jodie Foster), Elysium’s murderous secretary of defense who commands an army of peasant-killing robots. So Delacourt is almost as terrible of a defense secretary as Robert McNamara was. (According to Blomkamp, the character’s personality and look were inspired by French politician Christine Lagarde, managing director of the International Monetary Fund.)

So, yeah, there are (very) political themes and—if you will—messages in this movie. It’s dishonest to say otherwise, particularly because these themes are what power the film. Elysium, like many movies before it, presents a perspective—but that doesn’t mean the filmmakers have an agenda. There’s nothing wrong with suggesting a fairly uncontroversial view (poor people deserve things, too) in your gory summer action film.

But Elysium is far from perfect. Some of the strained dialogue sounds like it was written in a freshman seminar. The frequently superb Foster is miscast and laughably unconvincing as a ruthless oppressor. And the action and commentary don’t approach the kinetic body slam or cleverness of Blomkamp’s previous effort. But as far as health care movies with guns go, this has just enough humanity to keep you engaged, and enough tense sci-fi bloodletting to meet popular demand. At the very least, it’s an improvement on John Q, the 2002 drama in which Denzel Washington takes hostages at a hospital in order to save his son’s life and make a compelling case for Hillarycare.

Now check out the trailer for Neill Blomkamp’s Multiplex-Delivered Propaganda For Universal Health Coverage. I mean, Elysium. I meant Elysium.

Elysium gets a wide release on Friday, August 9. The film is rated R for Matt Damon. Click here for local showtimes and tickets.

Click here for more TV and film coverage from Mother Jones.

To read more of Asawin’s reviews and culture reporting, click here.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate