“South Park” Opens Its 17th Season With an Episode on NSA Spying

Screenshot: <a href="http://www.comedycentral.com/press/press_releases/2013/092013-south-park-season-17-premiere.jhtml">comedycentral.com</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Wednesday night, South Park returns for its 17th season on Comedy Central. The animated comedy series’ creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone—and the rest of the South Park writing staff—have a track record of mining major news stories for plot and satirical content. (Each episode is made within a high-pressure six days right before airing, which allows the show to stay relevant in news cycles.) In their latest season premiere, they address the controversy surrounding revelations of the National Security Agency‘s spying programs.

“I should be careful; Kyle‘s here and I think he might work for the NSA,” says the corpulent, Jew-baiting Eric Cartman.

Cartman then reminds his friends that the US government is capable of monitoring all the their email activity, as well as their Twitter accounts. For this reason, Cartman only uses “Shitter,” a new microblogging service that reads his mind and posts his thoughts directly to the Shitter website without the NSA snooping on him. “The government won’t respect my privacy,” Cartman says. He later admits that that there are so far only two people on Shitter: Cartman and actor/future MSNBC host Alec Baldwin (whom Parker and Stone have lampooned in the past).

Here’s a clip from the episode, titled “Let Go, Let Gov“:

According to the synopsis, Cartman “wants to hold the government accountable for secretly monitoring all of his personal information” and somehow manages to infiltrate the NSA. (The NSA did not respond to Mother Jones‘ request for comment regarding South Park.)

South Park is no stranger to exploring or poking fun at hot-button issues. The show and its creators have what could arguably be labeled a libertarian streak. (Author and blogger Andrew Sullivan famously coined the term “South Park Republican” in 2001, and ostensibly right-leaning quotes attributed to Parker and Stone, such as “I hate conservatives, but I really fucking hate liberals,” help fuel the series’ reputation as a libertarian-friendly haven for politically incorrect humor.) Though Parker and Stone have a soft spot for targeting left orthodoxies, including Hollywood’s limousine liberalism to anti-tobacco campaigns, they have a long history of inserting their characters into national political discussions in the name of mocking both the left and right in equal measure. Two years ago, South Park parodied Occupy Wall Street in an episode called “1%.” The show has taken on conservative anti-immigration hardliners. The crew has had their fun with Al Gore and his environmental activism. Glenn Beck and insane right-wing talk radio have gotten the South Park treatment. There was that amazing art-imitates-life moment involving Blackwater and hundreds of AK-47s. The series was highly praised and honored for slamming the media coverage of the Terri Schiavo case in 2005.

The South Park team’s penchant for controversy, political and otherwise, has made them targets for a diverse array of foes. Not only has a Canadian judge attacked the show’s worth and morality, but Parker and Stone were subjected to thinly veiled death threats from Muslim extremists over their depictions of the Prophet Muhammad.

So, yes, the series has a rich political history. An episode satirizing domestic spying programs is merely a more recent example.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate