Does Rick Perry Want to Make Texas a No-Fly Zone?

Scott McIntyre/St. Petersburg Times/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Texas lawmakers are expected to vote on a bill Wednesday that would effectively outlaw many routine airport searches by the Transportation Security Administration. If it passes, a TSA screener who touches the “anus, sexual organs, or breasts” of a passenger without probable cause could face jail time—a prospect that has the Obama administration threatening to sue the Lone Star state and even cancel flights. A rattled state Senate seemed to have dropped the bill before Gov. Rick Perry put it back on the agenda again last week, perhaps seeing a high-stakes fight with the feds as fuel for a presidential bid. But why stop at that? Some of the bill’s most enthusiastic backers view it as a key first step towards an even bigger goal: The establishment of an independent Republic of Texas.

“If the federal government follows up on its threat and suspends air travel, I honestly think we are going to gain a lot of members in a big hurry,” says Dave Mundy, media director for the Texas Nationalist Movement (TNM), a pro-secession group that claims an active membership of 10,000. “An air embargo, which is what they are talking about, would actually be an act of war. I mean, that’s what happens when you declare war on somebody. You establish a no-fly zone.”

Yesterday, TNM president Daniel Miller wrote on the group’s website that “Texas is not Iraq.” (“Will Washington choose to engage the Texan 149th Fighter Wing and their F-16 air superiority fighters?”) Miller also pointed to this “brilliant” observation from an anonymous blogger: “The state of Texas has more military capability than the United Kingdom, and so, unless Washington plans to nuke them, they might want to consider how well they might do engaging Texan F-16s while they allege the right to violate United States Code and the Constitution.”

Miller wasn’t immediately available for an interview, and Mundy sought to downplay any suggestion that the Texas Nationalists are eager to go to war. “Even the most hardcore of the statists really do not want to take up arms,” he told me. “They may talk a good game for a minute, but once they start seeing bombs falling on Walmart, they will change their tune.” Still, Mundy felt that the TSA bill could be the “impetus” for the Texas Nationalist Movement to expand deeper into politics, possibly through the creation of its own Texas Independence Party.

Mundy, a balding former Marine with a thick goatee, lives in Gonzales, a tiny town that played a large role in the creation of Texas. In October, 1835, Mexican troops from San Antonio arrived in Gonzales to seek the return of a small cannon that locals had been given to ward off Indians. When the town refused to give it back, the first shots of the state’s war for independence were fired. Mundy publishes a weekly newspaper in town, the Gonzales Cannon, which is neutral on Texas nationhood and mostly covers things like football games and girl scout meetings. He’s also the author of an e-book entitled, “Dances with Chihuahuas.”

That Texas already won its independence and managed to govern itself for 10 years before joining the United States certainly helps the nationalist cause, Mundy acknowleges. Indeed, nationalism is such a part of the state identity that it’s hard to separate the serious Texas nationalists from the merely romantic ones. The group claims to have signed up 200,000 supporters on its website.

Mundy, for his part, angrily denounces secessionist posers. He dismisses Gov. Perry’s infamous pro-secession comments of 2009 as mere “pandering,” calling him a RINO (Republican in Name Only) who “makes great statements but never backs up his words with deeds.” Mundy first soured on Perry when the governor promised to build a 4,000-mile megahighway and then wimped out as soon as his people started getting death threats. He thinks Perry’s recent embrace of the TSA anti-groping bill is just another political ploy, and that a return to Texan nationhood would bring about a return of real leaders, people like the late great Daniel Boone.

I asked Mundy if he thought Boone would have submitted to a TSA pat-down. “Oh no, he would have butt stroked ’em,” he said. “He’d a took the rifle butt and just butt stroked ’em right across the chops.”

UPDATE: The anti-TSA bill went down in flames late this morning, but Mundy still sees the fracas with the feds as a benefit to his cause. “Even if the bill doesn’t pass,” he told me yesterday, “I think we have sent a message.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate