Wisconsin Union Chief: “Seriously Considering a Run” Against Scott Walker in Recall

Professional Firefighters of Wisconsin president Mahlon Mitchell.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/antrover/5504633450/sizes/m/in/photostream/">Dave Hoefler</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


You couldn’t miss Mahlon Mitchell at this winter’s populist uprising in Madison, Wisconsin. Mitchell, president of the Professional Firefighters of Wisconsin, gave impassioned speeches on the steps outside the state Capitol in defense of workers’ rights, and he led firefighters in a march into the rotunda to roaring cheers from the protestors. Mitchell’s role in the protests catapulted him into something of a celebrity among union members and activists in Wisconsin, especially considering that firefighters were exempted from Gov. Scott Walker’s anti-union budget repair bill.

Now Mitchell is eyeing a bigger stage: the governor’s mansion. In an interview with Mother Jones, he said he was “seriously considering a run” for governor in a potential recall election targeting Walker. He said he believes Wisconsinites are sick of professional politicians not following through on campaign promises, and that a populist candidate running against Walker stands a better chance of unseating the governor. The ideal candidate would be “able to talk with common people about common issues,” Mitchell said. “Tell ’em what you can do and what you can’t do.”

Union leaders and state politicos had already approached him about running against Walker in a recall election, Mitchell explained. He also said he’d recently formed an informal committee to test the waters about a recall candidacy, but stressed he had yet to decide one way or the other. “It’s a decision I’ll make very soon,” he said.

Graeme Zielinski, a spokesman for the Democratic Party of Wisconsin, said the party isn’t commenting on specific candidates. “We have a strong stable of candidates, all of whom would be a worthy alternative to Scott Walker,” he says. As for Mitchell, Zielinski praises the union chief for having been “on the front lines in the fight against Walker. Mitchell has been there from the get-go, standing with the people.”

Anti-Walker groups will begin the recall effort—sparked by Walker’s attack on collective bargaining rights for most public-sector unions and the subsequent protests that engulfed Madison in February and March—on November 15. Organizers have two months to collect more than 540,000 signatures to trigger a recall election, but the grassroots coalition United Wisconsin says it hopes to gather more than 700,000. If they succeed—which many politicos, including the chair of the Wisconsin GOP, believe will happen—the actual election will likely take place in late April or early May 2012, say Democratic and union sources. Democrats hope to announce a challenger to Walker in the next month; potential candidates include former US Rep. David Obey, Milwaukee mayor Tom Barrett, Rep. Ron Kind, former assistant attorney general and Dane County executive Kathleen Falk, and state Sen. Jon Erpenbach.

A recent Public Policy Polling survey of Wisconsinites showed that 48 percent of respondents favor recalling Walker and 49 percent do not. Walker’s approval rating was 47 percent, while 51 percent disapprove.”Voters aren’t as angry with him as they were earlier in the year,” said PPP president Dean Debnam, “and if Russ Feingold’s really out of the mix there’s not an obvious Democrat to pit against him.” However, Democratic pollster Paul Maslin dismissed that polling, saying Walker remains vulnerable and has a short window of time to convince voters that his policies are working. “I have full confidence that the voters are not afraid of [recalling Walker],” Maslin says. “People come up to me and say, ‘It can’t happen, can it?’ I say, ‘You’re underestimating the people in this state.'”

Mitchell’s name rarely surfaces in discussions of possible Walker challengers, partly because he lacks political experience. A lieutenant in the Madison Fire Department, Mitchell was elected president of the Professional Firefighters of Wisconsin earlier this year. He’s the youngest and first black person ever to hold the position. “It’s time for a change,” he told me. “Time for us to get back to issues—Wisconsin first, everything else second.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate