Should Wyoming Build an Aircraft Carrier? (Updated)

The USS John C. Stennis, a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier, patrols the dangerous West Thumb of Yellowstone Lake.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/usnavy/6141549914/">Walter M. Wayman</a>/US Navy

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Update: A little Internet scrutiny goes a long way, apparently: The Wyoming Tribune Eagle reports that the aircraft provision has been scrapped. We take full credit. Details are here.

On Friday, the Wyoming House of Representatives advanced a bill to set up a task force to prepare for the total economic and political collapse of the United States. Per the bill, the panel would investigate things like food storage options and metals-based currencies, to be implemented in the event of a major catastrophe.

Then it goes three steps further. An amendment by GOP state Rep. Kermit Brown*, calls on the task force to examine “Conditions under which the state of Wyoming should implement a draft, raise a standing army, marine corps, navy and air force and acquire strike aircraft and an aircraft carrier.” As the bill’s GOP sponsor, state Rep. David Miller, explained to the Casper Star-Tribune, “Things happen quickly sometimes.”

Buying an aircraft carrier is, as a rule, a great idea, but there are a few hiccups, not the least of which is that Wyoming is currently landlocked. Its largest body of water, Yellowstone Lake, is frozen from December through June and sits in the middle of a giant volcano that stands about as good a chance as anything else at triggering the aforementioned societal collapse. In that sense, Wyoming has a lot in common with another mineral-rich, landlocked, mountainous territory—Bolivia. Bolivians, who have a national holiday honoring the day in 1904 they lost their coastline to Chile, have made the best of their situation by maintaining a small flotilla on Lake Titicaca. No aircraft carrier, though.

But there’s a lot of water in the world and Wyoming could presumably find some if things got hairy. Besides, depending on the nature of the disaster, the problem could take care of itself. A reprise of the Great Flood might be the most obvious—but by no means the only—scenario. The original deluge allegedly dropped Noah et al. on top of Turkey’s Mount Ararat, 16,584 feet above sea level. Any repeat would leave the entire state (maximum elevation: 13,804 feet) sufficiently submerged to support a carrier. In that scenario, a carrier might be the only thing left.

Wyoming’s real problem, though, is that buying an aircraft carrier entails paying for an aircraft carrier. The newest Nimitz-class vessel, the USS George H.W. Bush, cost an estimated $6.2 billion to construct (aircraft sold separately), 50 percent more than the state’s annual budget of $4 billion. The Bush took eight years to make, so if Wyoming broke up the payments accordingly, it would amount to a $775 million annual expenditure. With each additional year you add to the construction, the costs increase and the technological advantages are diminished. Take too long and those Bolivians might catch up.

One of the problems with Wyoming wanting an aircraft carrier is that Wyoming is landlocked.

Once the carrier is built—and since Rep. Miller thinks doomsday could come any day now, there’s not a minute to lose—the state would still have to pay to operate it. Like a good color printer, the hidden costs of an aircraft carrier come after the initial purchase. The Federation of American Scientists pegged the annual operating cost of a Nimitz-class carrier at $120 million. We haven’t even covered the other institutional costs of maintaining an aircraft carrier—the establishment and maintenance of a naval academy, for instance. And this back-of-the-envelope budgeting doesn’t take into account the precipitous drop in revenues that would accompany a total collapse of society. What’s more, the end of America would likely come at time of intense global Linstability, severely driving up prices for the limited number of aircraft carriers that become available for purchase each year.

So: Wyoming’s quest to build an aircraft carrier is kind of an uphill battle. But at least it’s not alone when it comes to hastily considered contingency plans. In 2010, Bossier Parish, Louisiana, drew national attention when the sheriff’s department launched “Operation Exodus” to train citizens how to survive in the event of a similar breakdown.

And if Wyoming does become an armed-and-dangerous rogue state, at least we know it’ll be in good hands. Three words: President Alan Simpson.

Update: Via Twitter, Charles Homans notes that Wyoming could cut costs upfront by acquiring a used aircraft carrier, such as the decommisioned one the British Navy placed on eBay in 2010. But as the Telegraph reported, “over the years her engines, pumps and gear boxes were cannibalised for use in other ships” and most of its value would come as scrap metal.

Update II: The Wyoming Tribune Eagle‘s Trevor Brown reports that, as of Monday afternoon, the aircraft-carrier amendment has been scrapped. The rest of the bill to create a Doomsday task force is still alive.

Correction: This article originally misidentified the amendment’s author as GOP rep. David Miller. Miller is the bill’s sponsor.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate