As Campaign Ends, Gingrich Thanks His Sugar Mommy and Daddy

Former speaker of the house Newt Gingrich, in happier times.Mark Makela/ZumaPress.com

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Newt Gingrich thanked all of the usual suspects at his campaign sendoff in a crowded room in the second floor of the Ballston, Virginia, Hilton on Tuesday. He thanked his two debate coaches, grandson Robert and granddaughter Maggie. He thanked his wife, Callista. He thanked Bill O’Brien, the speaker of the New Hampshire House of Representatives. He thanked Texas Gov. Rick Perry, satirist Herman Cain*, and former Alaska First Dude Todd Palin.

Then he threw in two more names. “And of course, while they weren’t directly associated with the campaign, it would be impossible for me to be here without Sheldon and Miriam Adelson, who single-handedly came very, very close to matching Romney’s super-PAC,” he said. “I’m very, very grateful.”

To the extent that Gingrich’s 2012 presidential campaign will be remembered by future generations, it will be not because of any comments about moon bases or kosher meals or electromagnetic pulses or penguins (okay, perhaps the penguins). It’ll be because of the transformed campaign financing system he relied on.

Over the course of the campaign, Sheldon Adelson, a wealthy Las Vegas casino baron, and his wife Miriam, gave $20 million to the pro-Gingrich super-PAC Winning our Future, a sum that amounted to well over half of the overall contributions. Other super-PACs brought in more, but few relied as heavily on one funding stream. Gingrich’s own outfit struggled with fundraising from the start (it’s currently $4 million in the hole); without the Adelsons, there was no campaign. It was a glimpse into the post-Citizens United dystopia, in which political candidates were little more than Second Life-avatars for their affiliated donors.

As for the farewell address, it was Gingrich distilled to his concentrated essence. He described the United States as “a country that was founded in 1607” by John Smith. In one memorable 45-second burst he rattled off proper nouns like a bingo hall announcer on meth (more on that in a second): “health savings accounts”; “people in Chile”; “Galveston, Texas”; “radical Islam, Saudi kings, and Chinese bond-holders.” He thanked President Obama for traveling to Afghanistan but chided him for failing to recognize that “the center of Al Qaeda today is Yemen” (this last bit was admittedly tough to hear over the drones).

And although he noted that Callista had told him that the “moon colony was probably not my most clever comment in the campaign,” Gingrich was ready to declare victory on his signature campaign issue. He noted that Google was already considering a plan to mine minerals on asteroids and Richard Branson was on the verge of launching his own Virgin Galactic space program. Space is important because it gives kids something to aspire to, he said. “I happen to think that’s a better future than methamphetamine and cocaine.”

From here, Gingrich’s role is unclear. He left without taking questions and his spokesman, R.C. Hammond, was mum on whether a formal endorsement of Mitt Romney was imminent. “You guys got 617 numbers you can call?,” he said, referring to Romney’s Boston office. “Leave me alone!”

Most likely, though, Gingrich will reprise the role he never fully left behind—traveling pitchman. His 12-month odyssey seemed at times like an effort to redefine “retail politics” into something more literal; campaign stops were often punctuated by book signings and special screening of his production company’s documentaries. Truth be told, my main interest in checking out Gingrich’s farewell address was to snag an exit interview with the single best symbol of Gingrich’s book tour candidacy—Ellis the Elephant, the time-traveling pachyderm star of Callista’s children’s book. A ubiquitous presence on the campaign trail, Ellis’ identity was never revealed, except to note that he moonlighted as a paid staffer for the Gingrich campaign.

No luck. For once, the gray furry elephant in the room wasn’t in the room at all.

*Throwing it out there.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate