Here’s Why the Syrian Electronic Army Targeted Justin Bieber With Homosexuality Rumors


The Syrian Electronic Army, a loosely defined collective of hackers supporting the mass-murdering regime of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, are known for disrupting the social-media operations of news outlets, activists, and human rights groups. Over the weekend, the army found itself a new target: pop icon Justin Bieber and his devout fanbase of “Beliebers.”

On Saturday, somebody claiming to be an SEA member hacked the Twitter account of the entertainment news outlet E! Online and sent out the following tweets:

Justin Bieber Syrian Electronic Army tweet gay
Justin Bieber E! Online tweet

Nearly an hour after that first tweet, the Assad-loyalist hacker sent this from the E! house account:

Justin Bieber gay Syrian Electronic Army Twitter hacking E Online

The phony tweets also contained links that reportedly directed followers to malware downloads or other damaging websites. As a result, the E! Online Twitter account was briefly suspended. “Eonline’s breaking news twitter and sms accounts were compromised today,” an NBCUniversal spokesperson said in a statement. “We’re working to have this resolved as quickly as possible and are fully investigating the incident. We apologize for any confusion that the erroneous news alerts may have caused.” (Justin Bieber and his publicist did not respond to multiple requests for comment.)

So why did the SEA target Justin Bieber and his adoring fans? Or Spring Breakers star Selena Gomez or Angelina Jolie, for that matter?

“The SEA seeks publicity by claiming political significance to otherwise non-political websites, and targeting these web sites because they are simply vulnerable opportunities,” Helmi Noman, senior researcher at University of Toronto’s the Citizen Lab (and a leading expert on the Syrian Electronic Army), wrote in an email to Mother Jones. “The SEA has defaced websites that it describes as hostile to the Syrian regime when the websites are nothing but online businesses or personal websites which have nothing to do with the politics of the region. Also, the SEA likes media attention and to stay relevant. Compromising the E! Online Twitter account comes in this context.” These efforts to stay relevant have also included hacking the Onion‘s Twitter feed on Monday, apparently.

SEA isn’t the only hacker collective supporting the Assad regime—another group, the MAF Battalion, has its own mischievous web operations, some of which target the Turkish government. (Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdo?an has been highly critical of Assad). But SEA is the most well known of the groups. SEA gained significant media attention in April for hacking CBS News Twitter accounts and pumping out authoritarian, anti-American propaganda; this was widely believed to be retaliation for the State Department’s announcement that the United States would double nonlethal assistance to the Syrian opposition and provide new humanitarian aid.

Another prank occurred in March, when SEA successfully attacked the website of Human Rights Watch. According to those who were at HRW during the incident, it wasn’t exactly a technical marvel. “I don’t want to say it was a minor [incident], but it was not a sophisticated attack,” Emma Daly, communications director at HRW, told Mother Jones. “[Whoever did it] obviously didn’t like our reporting on Syria.”

SEA’s activities within Syria aren’t as easy to laugh off. Pro-regime hackers routinely go after protesters and cyber dissidents who live under a near-constant threat of death. “Hijacking Twitter accounts qualifies as a weapon of mass annoyance,” Martin Libicki, an expert in cyberwar and senior management scientist at the RAND Corporation, says. “But if they hack into the computers of Syrian dissidents, that’s what’s serious, because people die.” (Along with the indiscriminate killing, the Assad government has been accused of compiling extensive hit lists.)

When SEA directs its ire at American media, the consequences are decidedly less severe. “We’re not exactly dealing with the world’s most mature individuals,” Libicki continues. “We see a prank, and [the SEA hacker] might say, ‘We’ve struck a blow to the American colossus!'”

Still, at least one Syria-connected hack attack on Western media outlets has had serious real-world consequences. In April, SEA used the Associated Press Twitter account to send out a tweet falsely claiming that two explosions had rocked the White House and that President Obama had been injured. That one message destabilized American financial markets.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate