Rick Santorum Named CEO of a Christian Film Studio. Here’s What He Actually Knows About Movies.

Ron Sachs/Cnp/Prensa Internacional/ZUMA Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Is Rick Santorum the next Jeffrey Katzenberg?

Well, no, probably not. But like the DreamWorks mogul, Santorum will soon be the CEO of a movie studio. Over the weekend, failed Republican presidential candidate/former senator/gross-out internet obsession Santorum announced that he had been named CEO of EchoLight Studios, a Dallas-based, “family-friendly” film company catering to Christian audiences. “This is the right place and right time, and I’ve jumped in with both feet,” Santorum said on Monday. “Dallas can become the Hollywood of the faith-and-family movie market…We’re in a position with potential to transform the industry.” (Santorum and a representative for EchoLight Studios did not respond to Mother Jones‘ requests for comment regarding his new gig.)

Santorum has urged America’s religious right to try to inject their message into mainstream pop culture before. In a speech at the Heritage Foundation in 2011, he instructed Christian conservatives to up their game. “The problem in the past is that you have these people who create these Christian films—great message, terrible acting, horrible editing. They are not entertaining, they’re preachy…[If you] entertain them and leave them a good message…people will show up.”

By now, it’s well established that Santorum’s idea of a good message may include horrifically demonizing gay people, attempting to torpedo reproductive rights, and ripping off American veterans. But what does the man know about movies? Here’s what:

1. He’s used horror movie imagery to attack Obama. During the 2012 campaign, Team Santorum released its “Obamaville” ad, envisioning a future in which President Barack Obama is reelected to a second term and America loses its quality health care and freedom of religion—or something. The ad apes the imagery, style, and tone of classic horror films. “Those kind of shots are common to post-apocalyptic zombie movies,” Prof. Spencer Parsons, who teaches film production at Northwestern University told Reuters. “You kind of half expect a zombie to shamble around the corner.” Alfred Hitchcock and The Twilight Zone also come to mind. Check out the spot:

2. His favorite movie is… Field of Dreams, the critically acclaimed 1989 drama about baseball, family, ghosts, and sentimentality, starring Kevin Costner and James Earl Jones. The film was set and shot in Iowa, a state that hosts the caucus Santorum won in 2012. He is also a huge fan of fantasy baseball, which he has been playing for nearly two decades. (For comparison, Mitt Romney picked O Brother, Where Art Thou? as his favorite film of all time, while presidential hopeful Ron Paul went with “I don’t watch many movies.”)

3. Santorum’s abandoned film project…about Iranians. In 2007 (not long after he lost his Senate seat), Santorum was reportedly in talks with The Passion of the Christ and Braveheart producer Stephen McEveety to work on a movie about three Iranian brothers, one of whom turns to a life of Islamic terrorism. Sadly, the project never got off the ground. On a related note, here’s Santorum flirting with a terrifyingly fringe, nuclear-Iran, end-times theory.

4. He is familiar (hopefully) with Monty Python. In March 2012, Romney aides compared Santorum’s primary-campaign persistence in the face of inevitable defeat to that of the Black Knight in Monty Python and the Holy Grail. If Santorum didn’t get the reference, hopefully he was curious enough to Google up the clip below.

5. He’s worked with an Oscar-winning film director. Santorum played himself in Steven Soderbergh‘s short-lived, partially improvised political series K Street, which aired on HBO in 2003. In the episode “Week 1,” Santorum is shown walking through Washington, DC, talking shit about Democratic strategist James Carville (who also plays himself). Then-senator Santorum is briefly seen and heard in this promotional clip for the show:

6. He wants to ban porn flicks. During the primary race, Santorum made a perfectly Santorum-esque campaign promise to wage a White House-led war on pornographic cinema and other forms of porn if elected president. Funny enough, former House speaker Newt Gingrich—one of Santorum’s primary foes—took on his own conservative base during the 1990s to keep the internet open and free for smut, and in doing so sort of helped save porn in America.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate