For Richer or Poorer

Whose wedding is it, anyway?

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


For Richer or PoorerFor all but royalty, weddings were once modest affairs; now they are a $50 billion annual industry.


According to the GAO, there are 1,138 federal statutes in which marital status factors into benefits and rights.

The average American wedding costs $22,360 and has 168 guests, who give 100 gifts that cost an average of $85 each, meaning the net loss to the couple is $13,860.

The average guest spends $500 to attend a wedding—not including plane tickets.

Bush’s proposed “Healthy Marriage Initiative” would spend $1.5 billion to promote marriage among the poor.

An increase of $1 per hour in a man’s wages increases the odds he will marry by 5%.

40% of all guests now fly to weddings, more than 60% of which entail at least two days’ worth of events.

43% of couples say they spent more on their wedding
than they had planned.

ln 2001, Washington, D.C., Alabama, and Michigan each received
a $25 million federal “illegitimacy bonus” for reducing rates of children born to unmarried parents while keeping abortion rates flat. The illegitimacy rates were reduced by 4%, 0.25%, and 0.0009%, respectively.

43% of first marriages end within 15 years.



The cost of the average American wedding has been steadily climbing.

Red states have a divorce rate 27% higher than blue states.

24 states have laws against adultery.

61% of couples omit the word “obey” from their vows, but 83% of brides take their husband’s name.

It was only in 1967 that the Supreme Court invalidated state
laws prohibiting people of different races from marrying.

Top 10 Most Wanted Gifts in the UK

On either side of the Atlantic, some gifts are jolly good, while others are just bollocks.

Top 10 Most Unwanted Gifts in the UK

If the average amount spent on a wedding were invested at a 10% annual return rate, it would pay for the expected private college tuition of an infant.

Cultural conservatives may abhor gay marriage, but not so wedding-related businesses, which, Forbes magazine forecasts, can expect a $17 billion windfall from gay unions.

Couples who marry in a Disney World “Fairy
Tale Wedding”™ can tie the knot in an array of ersatz locales, including Animal Kingdom or Oz. For $2,500 a bride can arrive in a glass coach pulled by four dappled gray ponies.

There are at least 27 wedding reality TV shows, including
Whose Wedding Is It Anyway?

Only 38% of wedded Americans say they are “happily married.”

Nearly half of all U.S. nuptials involve at least one remarriage. Liza Minnelli’s 4th wedding cost $7,000 for each day the marriage lasted.

75% of all divorced people remarry, half of them within three years.

Ojani Noa*

Yes, but “I don’t want to talk about it,” says Noa.

He proposed at Selena wrap party.

Sean Combs

J-Lo gave Puffy diamond-studded pinkie ring

Puffy accused of using ring to bribe driver to take rap for an illegal gun.

Cris Judd*

4-carat

Met on Love Don’t Cost a Thing set. He got $15 million in divorce.

Ben Affleck

6-carat, $1.2 million

Knockoffs sell for $19.95

Marc Anthony*

8-carat

J-Lo wore 198 carats at wedding.

*actually married


Up to 20% of couples use a prenuptial agreement, including Catherine Zeta-Jones, who, were she and Michael Douglas to divorce, would reportedly get $2.8 million for each year of marriage. Their wedding cost between $1.5 and $2 million—offset by selling exclusive photos of the ceremony to Britain’s OK! magazine for $1.6 million, and a $24,000 judgment against Hello!
magazine for running unapproved photos.


Founded in 1888 by Cecil Rhodes, De Beers has three operating principles: control supply, raise prices, and sell the romance of rarity.

De Beers hires N.W. Ayer and Co. to make diamonds “a psychological necessity…the larger and finer the diamond, the greater the expression of love.” Within three years, 80% of engagements are consecrated with a diamond ring.

After a sociologist advises diamonds be presented as a symbol of a man’s ability to “get into the competitive race,” N.W. Ayer begins loaning gems to actresses, “who can make the grocer’s wife say, ‘I wish I had what she has.’”

Department of Justice charges De Beers with “conspiring to restrict production, monopolize sales and arbitrarily influence prices” by cornering 95% of world market. De Beers executives fail to show up in court, pull company out of U.S. market, opting to use middlemen.

“A Diamond Is Forever” slogan debuts. Jewelers instructed to tell men—who buy 90% of all diamonds—to spend at least two months’ salary on ring. The not-so-subtle message: Can you afford not to?

De Beers gains control of huge Soviet cache of small stones and begins emphasizing “color, cut, and clarity.”

Thanks to 14-year campaign to glamorize Western wedding customs, 60% of Japanese wives sport diamond rings; their husbands spend more on them than American counterparts.

DOJ again charges De Beers with price-fixing. Executives again skip court and can’t visit the U.S. for fear of arrest.

Advertising Age declares “A Diamond is Forever” the most effective slogan of 20th century, recognized by 90% of Americans.

“Three-stone anniversary ring” campaign is an instant success.

“Diamonds that make a statement”—i.e., they’re bigger— campaign aimed at affluent married couples. Uses slogans like: “Thank you, Bob… Thank you, Lord.”

De Beers markets “right-hand ring” to “stylish” and “independent” single women. Uses slogan, “Your left hand says ‘we,’ your right hand says ‘me.’”

De Beers pays $10 million antitrust penalty, clearing way to open stores in the U.S. It now controls 60% of world market.

Sources

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate