Stone the Whales! Gay Sex is Terrorism! Muslims Suck!

And other bits of wisdom from Bryan Fischer, who’ll be sharing the stage with Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee, and Rick Santorum at this weekend’s Values Voter Summit.

Bryan Fischer at the 2009 Values Voters Summit.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


As the director of issues analysis at the American Family Association, Bryan Fischer has issued some rather interesting “analysis” over the past year. He has said that Muslims should be banned from serving in the military; that a whale at Sea World should have been stoned to death for killing its trainer; that inbreeding makes Muslims stupid and violent; and that gay sex is a form of domestic terrorism. So naturally, he has been invited to speak to a huge gathering of conservative political activists this weekend, alongside such GOP luminaries as Rick Santorum, Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), and Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.).

Sponsored by the Family Research Council, the Values Voter Summit is the premier Christian-right political gathering in Washington, DC. Running for three days this weekend, the summit is most notable for its straw poll, which serves as a testing ground for Republicans thinking of throwing their hats into the ring for the next presidential primary. Virtually all the GOP presidential wannabes will be there (though Sarah Palin won’t), along with a who’s who of social conservative activists. Thousands will gather to attend panel discussions on the “American Apocalypse,” the “Obama Administration’s War on Life,” and “How To Reach the Online Generation (Without Losing Your Soul).” Robert Davi, the character actor who narrated the infamous Demon Sheep ad, will talk to the crowd about Hollywood conservatism. And Fischer will address a plenary session—shortly after Bill Bennett and Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell speak, and right before Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal is scheduled to appear.

People for the American Way, a liberal advocacy group, has urged leading Republicans to bail on the event, lest they be seen as legitimizing Fischer’s bigotry. PFAW president Michael B. Keegan, said in a statement:

By sharing a stage with Fischer, public figures like Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee, Mike Pence, Bob McDonnell, and Michele Bachmann don’t necessarily endorse Fischer’s shameless anti-Muslim and anti-gay propaganda—but they do acknowledge its credibility. Any candidate thinking seriously of running for president in 2012 should think twice about standing alongside a man who has called for the deportation of all Muslims in America; insulted Muslim servicemembers; claimed that brave Americans died in vain because Iraq was not converted to Christianity; and called gay people deviants, felons, pedophiles, and terrorists. Bryan Fischer is no mainstream conservative. And neither is any person who shares a platform with him while refusing to denounce his hate-filled propaganda.

(Fischer has since attacked PFAW on his radio show for calling him a bigot, but his argument wasn’t especially persuasive. For instance, in response to his earlier calls to deport all Muslims, Fischer claimed that he was simply suggesting the US would be “doing them a favor by repatriating them to their homeland where an entire nation shares their values.” Most of his defense only seemed to confirm PFAW’s criticism, but later he thanked PFAW for helping to spread his message. Read his response here and here.)

Whether or not leading Republican lawmakers and presidential contenders agree with Fischer, if they appear at a conference that condones (and enables) Fischer’s extremism, Muslims overseas (and at home) may form the impression that such talk is sanctioned by current and potential US officials. It’s hard to imagine that Huckabee et al would feel comfortable speaking at an event where a featured speaker suggested that Jews should be banned from the military or prevented from building synagogues in the US.

Fischer is not the only fringe character on the lineup. Also invited to speak is retired Lt. Gen. William Boykin, who is equally outspoken in his views about gays and Muslims. Over the summer, Republicans briefly had him on the witness list to testify against now Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan about her treatment of the military at Harvard. But once his background got ’round the media, he was unceremoniously dumped from the list. Here’s what I wrote about him back then:

In 2002, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld tapped Boykin to serve as Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence, where he was charged with heading the military’s search for Osama bin Laden and other terrorist leaders. The following year, news leaked that Boykin had been spending a lot of his free time preaching in fundamentalist churches around the country about the Christian holy war on Islam.

Once, in an Oklahoma Baptist church, Boykin showed the congregation a series of photos he had taken in Somalia shortly after the famous 1993 Black Hawk Down incident, which resulted in the deaths of more than a dozen Americans. He claimed that a dark shadow that appeared in one of his photos across the top of Mogadishu was not a film processing fluke but rather the “principalities of darkness… It is a demonic presence in that city that God revealed to me as the enemy.” Such commentary led to an internal investigation and the military reprimanded Boykin for speaking out of school without permission. He finally retired in 2007 and ever since has been a regular on the fringe-right talk circuit, joining such luminaries as Peter LaBarbera and the Traditional Values Coalition’s Lou Sheldon to talk about the culture wars.

It seems unlikely that any of the Republican pols will drop out of the summit because of Fischer or Boykin. None of them are especially friendly to gays or Muslims, anyway. (Remember Huckabee’s famous “ick factor” quote in the New Yorker?) And Fischer has participated in Values Voter Summits in the past. At last year’s event, he opined that Adolph Hitler had come up with the idea of separation of church of state and was the inspiration for the forces of “secular fundamentalism” who were bent on “castrating” the church, according to PFAW’s blog Right Wing Watch. Given that Fischer is such a known quantity, the FRC isn’t likely to dump him just because some liberal advocacy group complains about him. After all, the entire summit is co-sponsored by Fischer’s employer, the American Family Association, which seems to have donated heavily to ensure that its reps dominate the schedule. Don Wildmon, AFA’s head honcho, and Buddy Smith, the executive vice president of the group, are both speaking at a luncheon during the conference.

That’s not to say that the summit organizers don’t have standards. The FRC has scratched speakers in the past. Last year, it disinvited former South Carolina governor Mark Sanford, who had been a rising star of the GOP and a potential presidential contender until he secretly flew off to Buenos Aires to visit his Argentine lover and told his staff that he was “hiking the Appalachian trail.” Also conspicuously absent fromt this year’s schedule is Carrie Prejean. The former Miss California became the darling of social conservatives after she made headlines for answering a Miss USA pageant question from Perez Hilton about gay marriage by saying marriage should be between a man and a woman. She lost the pageant but earned top billing at the 2009 Values Voter Summit, wowing the crowd by saying that “God chose me” for the gay marriage question in the pageant. The Prejean sex videos that emerged a few months later are no doubt one reason why she is not on the Values Voter lineup this year. As long as Fischer doesn’t produce any sex scandals, he likely will be free to spew all the anti-Muslim and anti-gay venom he can at the summit. And the GOP’s biggest names will be right there with him.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate