Clinton Calls Out SEC for Dodging Rule on CEO Pay

Five years after Dodd-Frank, the Obama administration is still dragging its feet.

Brian Cahn/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


With Bernie Sanders nipping at her heels in the presidential primary, Hillary Clinton is doing all she can to let liberal financial wonks know she’s on their side. The Democratic front-runner laid out her vision Friday for getting Wall Street to focus on long-term growth rather than just what she termed “quarterly capitalism”—business deals aimed at quick stock gains. In a speech at New York University, Clinton detailed a host of policy ideas to tackle the problem, such as creating a new tiered system to raise capital gains taxes, raising the minimum wage for certain workers, and diminishing the power of activist shareholders.

Slipped in among the big-picture reforms was a shout-out to an obscure, seemingly minor provision of Wall Street reform. “Many rules have yet to be put in place,” Clinton said, referring to the terms of the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform law. “That includes a requirement to publish the ratio between CEO pay and the paychecks of everyday employees. There is no excuse for taking five years to get this done. Workers have a right to know whether executive pay at their company has gotten out of balance—and so does the public.”

Clinton was referring to Section 953(b), a provision in Dodd-Frank that simply required companies to report the ratio between CEO pay and the company’s median wage. Those numbers would just have to be crunched and included in public companies’ annual reports. But the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been sitting on that rule for five years now, much to the chagrin of liberal reformers.

Dodd-Frank was an ambitious, wide-reaching law, meant to reshape the way the financial industry operates. Congress set the broad parameters, but left it to executive-branch bureaucrats to pin down the exact details of how all these new rules would be carried out, causing countless delays. Deadlines written into the bill proved overly ambitious, especially as Republicans in Congress refused to increase funding so that financial regulatory agencies could hire enough new employees to put the rules into place.

For Dodd-Frank’s fifth anniversary earlier this month, Public Citizen published a report urging the Obama administration to enact the law more quickly. Out of about 400 rules mandated by Dodd-Frank, fewer than two-thirds are currently being enforced. “Major portions of the law have yet to be codified into specific rules,” Bart Naylor, the report’s author, wrote. “Many enforcement dates are set well into the future, and certain rules are not yet being implemented and enforced to the fullest extent of the law.”

The CEO disclosure delay has particularly irked financial reformers and consumer advocates, given the rule’s simple premise. In 2013, the SEC voted 3-2 to move forward with writing a rule. It proposed one shortly thereafter and set a 60-day public comment period. But then silence, with no visible progress and no finalized rule. Initially, the commission promised to wrap up work by October 2014, but that deadline passed as the agency stalled on scheduling a vote.

Liberals have become increasingly vocal about their displeasure at the delay. Last December, 15 Democratic senators wrote a letter to the SEC requesting immediate action to finalize the rule. “While some opponents may prefer not to disclose this information,” the letter said, “Congress already enacted and the President already signed the requirement into law more than four years ago.” Two weeks ago, the AFL-CIO, MoveOn, and an array of liberal financial reform groups delivered a petition to the SEC, with 165,000 signatories requesting action on the rule.

Last month, frustration with SEC Chairwoman Mary Jo White spilled into the public with a scathing letter by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.). “You have now been SEC Chair for over two years, and to date, your leadership of the Commission has been extremely disappointing,” Warren wrote, specifically pointing to the failure to implement the CEO pay rule, among other complaints. Warren accused White of directly lying to her during a closed-door meeting in May, in which White tried to assure Warren that the rule was coming soon. “I cannot understand how and why this rule has been delayed for so long,” Warren wrote, “and I am perplexed as to why you told me personally that the rule would be completed by the fall of 2015 when it appears that you were or should have been aware of additional delays.” The SEC didn’t respond to a phone call seeking comment.

It remains to be seen if White will keep her promise to Warren to finish things up by the fall. But it might be harder for the commission to keep ignoring the rule now that Clinton has joined the chorus of Democrats denouncing the SEC’s indecision in public.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate