Guatemala’s President Resigned and Spent the Night in Jail. What’s Next?

Experts are eager to see if the Guatemalan Spring extends to this weekend’s presidential elections.

A demostrator holds a Guatemalan flag during a protest in Guatemala City on August 27, 2015.Luis Echeverria/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Otto Pérez Molina resigned as president of Guatemala late Wednesday night, stepping down after being implicated in a widespread corruption scheme that earlier this year cost his vice president her job. Pérez Molina, a former military general, had refused to leave office almost until the end, defying the wishes of tens of thousands of protesters who have been calling for his resignation for months. Now he sits in jail, awaiting the results of a hearing examining the evidence against him.

But it is what happens next that is of interest to Guatemalans and regional experts. Alejandro Maldonado, who took over the vice presidency after Roxana Baldetti resigned on May 8, was sworn in as president Thursday afternoon, but the nation faces elections this weekend that could determine whether the country’s brand new era of accountability will last.

Adriana Beltrán, who has been tracking the so-called Guatemalan Spring for the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA), said that simple, short-term goals will sustain the unprecedented coalition of groups who have spent months protesting in the streets.

“There are a number of sectors that have been working together and will continue to work together on a minimal, short-term anti-corruption agenda that they hopefully can advance in the next several months before the change of government,” she told reporters.

Beltrán said she was encouraged to see students from the public schools and the more conservative private schools, as well as members of the religious and business communities, working together. That these groups put aside their differences to call for the end of Pérez Molina’s tenure shows the country’s deep disdain for decades of political wrongdoing.

“It’s impressive because having the [Guatemalan chamber of commerce] come together with the human rights movement and the social movement and agree on a common agenda is not an easy thing—and not something you’ve seen in Guatemala regularly,” Beltrán told Mother Jones in an interview.

Guatemala’s next president will inherit a country dealing with some of the worst poverty and crime in the region—and one in which memories endure from a brutal 36-year civil war that killed 200,000 people. The biggest change is the country’s growing anti-corruption movement, which began in 2006 with the creation of the UN-backed International Commission Against Impunity in Guatemala (CICIG, in Spanish), an independent investigative body that teamed up with local prosecutors to root out ingrained, systemic malfeasance.

The United States has generally been supportive of the protests and calls for accountability, according to Beltrán. The Washington Post reported that the American Embassy in Guatemala City tweeted in Spanish its support of increased transparency.

Now attention turns to this weekend’s election. The leading candidate, a wealthy businessman named Manuel Baldizón, has his own ties to corruption through Edgar Barquin, his running mate. Barquin faces separate corruption charges for protecting businesses engaged in illegal campaign finance.  Another candidate is a former first lady, and a third, Jimmy Morales, is a comedian whose outsider candidacy, Beltrán said, could help him in the aftermath of Pérez Molina’s ouster. Whoever wins, she added, will now have to deal with a population that isn’t afraid to demand what it wants.

“It hasn’t been just about the governing party but also about the political system as a whole,” she said. “And what we are likely to see on Sunday’s election is a continuation of this demand for an end to corruption, a change in the political system, and people just not wanting the status quo, but truly demanding a change.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate