John Boehner’s Likely Successor Won’t Be Able to Tame the House GOP Either

Kevin McCarthy, the GOP’s No. 2, has the same problem as his boss: no leverage.

Carolyn Kaster/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


In the wake of John Boehner’s surprise resignation last week, House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) is the top contender for the speakership. But McCarthy seems unlikely to fare better with the rabble-rousing band of House GOP conservatives that made a mess of Boehner’s leadership at every turn. Why? It comes down to leverage—or rather the lack of it. Traditionally, party leaders have brought their rank-and-file to heel by doling out or withholding campaign cash and earmarks. Boehner banned earmarks, but he did have a huge war chest, filled mostly by corporate political action committees, to lord over his caucus. So does McCarthy. But Boehner didn’t—or couldn’t—buy influence with the tea party insurgents who dubbed themselves the Freedom Caucus. And McCarthy may have the same problem.

Boehner raised tens of millions of dollars over the years, and he plowed much of it into strengthening his party—channeling campaign cash to the National Republican Congressional Committee and contributing directly to hundreds of GOP lawmakers and candidates. In 2014 alone, Boehner’s leadership PAC, which supports other candidates, gave out more than $1.2 million to 181 GOP House candidates. But not a dime flowed to any of the nine founding members of the Freedom Caucus. While other factors came into play in Boehner’s downfall, that lack of a financial connection between the leadership and members of the extremist faction limited Boehner’s ability to rein them in.

Like Boehner, McCarthy is a prodigious fundraiser. So far in the 2016 election cycle, McCarthy’s campaign has raised $2.5 million and his leadership PAC has brought in another $1.3 million. And like Boehner, McCarthy has already given away large amounts this year—more than $500,000 in the first seven months to 64 fellow House members. But he’s contributed nothing to those nine founders of the Freedom Caucus—Reps. Justin Amash (Mich.), Ron DeSeantis (Fla.), John Fleming (La.), Scott Garrett (N.J.), Jim Jordan (Ohio), Raul Labrador (Idaho), Mark Meadows (N.C.), Mick Mulvaney (S.C.), and Matt Salmon (Ariz.). And of the 30 other House members who identify as members of this group, only two have received money from McCarthy’s PAC—a combined $10,000.

As McCarthy works to build support for the House GOP’s top job—and fends off a challenge from Utah’s Jason Chaffetz, a tea party favorite—part of his pitch to his colleagues is a promise that he will have better relations with his party’s insurgent wing. If he pulls that off, it won’t be because he has any more power over them than Boehner did.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate