A Bunch of the Country’s Top Cops Want to Stop Locking Everybody Up

As they head into a meeting with President Obama, these law enforcement officials say the justice system needs a major overhaul.

Demonstration co-leader Anthony Shahid protests the death of Michael Brown outside the Ferguson, Missouri, police station in August. Subsequent protests helped spur a national conversation on policing in America.Timothy Tai/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The United States has way too many people in jail. Our incarceration rate of about 500 prisoners per 100,000 people is the highest in the world, and those who are locked up are disproportionately people of color. A new group, including some of the law enforcement heads from some of the biggest cities in the country, will urge President Barack Obama on Thursday to help them to lower those rates, while also increasing public safety.

“We’re incarcerating the wrong people, and we’re measuring the wrong things,” said Garry F. McCarthy, superintendent of the Chicago Police Department, during a question-and-answer session with reporters in Washington on Wednesday. He was in the capital for the meeting with Obama and the public launch of a new organization of law enforcement officials that is calling for massive changes to the criminal justice system. “Ten years ago, if you heard a police chief say that arrests were down, people would be criticizing, ‘Why are your arrests down? You’re not doing your job,'” McCarthy said. “Today it’s something that we take pride in.”

Law Enforcement Leaders to Reduce Crime and Incarceration is made up of some of the most powerful police and prosecutors in the country. It includes McCarthy, but also the heads of the Los Angeles Police Department and the New York City Police Department, among others. In total, about 130 members from all 50 states are pushing for four broad policy goals: alternatives to incarceration, balance in the application of laws, mandatory-minimum sentence reform, and stronger ties with the communities they serve.

The group’s launch, and its goals for incarceration reform, comes amid a nationwide conversation about policing in the United States, a conversation that took on a heightened focus after the Ferguson, Missouri, police officer Darren Wilson shot and killed Michael Brown in August 2014. The resulting protests shed new light on the militarization of the police, police killings (especially the deaths of people of color), and the lack of reliable use-of-force data. The report from Obama’s task force on policing in the United States, which was released in March in response to Ferguson and other police protests, called for changes such as independent police prosecutions and more trust between police officers and the communities they serve.

The violence and the subsequent scrutiny also helped spawn the Black Lives Matter movement, which has helped drive national policy on police brutality against people of color, and has had a major impact on presidential politics (at least on the Democratic side).

Ben David, the district attorney for New Hanover and Pender counties in North Carolina, told Mother Jones that although various prosecutors, police officers, and judges have attempted to reduce incarceration in various ways over the years, the time is right to get some actual policy reforms pushed through.

“We’re here to say, we’re calling this country to a higher purpose right now,” he said. “We have a chance right now with the climate.”

The criminal justice system is not really broken,” he told reporters. “It’s producing the results that it was designed to produce, and those are the wrong results.”

One of the goals of the group is to lower incarceration by finding alternatives—for example, by imposing fines for what were once jailable offenses. But the financial exploitation by many local court systems of low-income minority communities adds another layer of complication to this possible solution. In some communities, low-income offenders have become a kind of ATM machine, providing revenue when local police officers cite people for minor offenses. To some of the group members at Wednesday’s launch, reforming that slice of the broken police-community relationship is key. 

“What we’re talking about today is overall sensible law enforcement, and that’s one of the things that we look at,” said James Johnson, the former undersecretary for enforcement for the US Treasury Department. “It’s very difficult to have community trust-building, which is one of the themes that many of the chiefs here spoke about, if you have a criminal justice system that really looks like it’s a piggy bank for the municipality in general. So that’s part of the themes that we’re trying to strike.”

How can this call for reforms work when others over the years have failed? Johnson said that having police chiefs and prosecutors with a combined 1,000 years of law enforcement experience leading the change will make the difference.

“Not everything that matters can be measured, but you have these voices talking about sensible law enforcement, and they represent cities in the North, the South, the East, and the West,” Johnson said. “Superintendent McCarthy was in the New York City Police Department for a very long time, 25 years. And having those perspectives and those voices, I think, can move the needle a tremendous amount. It’s not a silver bullet—there is no silver bullet—but it’s a significant contribution.”

McCarthy said the reform needs to be systemic to make any lasting difference.

“The criminal justice system is not really broken,” he told reporters. “It’s producing the results that it was designed to produce, and those are the wrong results. We have to change the way that we think about crime. We’re producing generations of individuals, through incarceration… who are going to fail unless we do something about it.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate