Is Jim Webb Really Running for President? An Investigation.

He’s maintaining a surprisingly low profile.

Nati Harnik/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Is Jim Webb actually running for president? I don’t even know—and it’s my job to.

I mean that literally: I’m covering the Webb campaign for Mother Jones. And on Monday, my editor wanted to know what was up with the former Virginia senator who’s vying, however quietly, for the Democratic nomination. He pops up in the news when he does interviews or attends an event—or when he’s accused of nearly beating a man to death as an Annapolis midshipman—but it’s sometimes hard to know he’s still out there if you don’t follow his Twitter feed. That feed, by the way, has just under 14,500 followers, fewer than the nearly 20,000 who follow former Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln Chafee, who’s even more under the radar as a Democratic hopeful. (To be fair, Webb beats Chafee on Facebook.)

Webb has occasionally been on the trail in Iowa, but almost always at large events like the Iowa State Fair or last week’s Rural Town Hall in Des Moines. He’s only shown up once in New Hampshire, according to Raymond Buckley, the chairman of the state’s Democratic Party, who also says he’s heard no mention of Webb’s campaign from potential primary voters. “The crickets here in New Hampshire are louder than the Webb campaign,” Buckley told Mother Jones. As for his finances, the issue that already forced Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and former Texas Gov. Rick Perry to drop out of the race, no one yet knows how they look. Webb formally announced his candidacy in early July, so he didn’t have to file a disclosure with the Federal Election Commission until last week. We should know in a few days how much cash Webb has raised, but, having rejected using a super-PAC, his war chest is likely to be modest.

With all that in mind, I emailed Craig Crawford, Webb’s communications director, to ask about the campaign. I wanted to see how many staffers or key volunteers Webb had signed up, particularly in Iowa and New Hampshire, where serious candidates need strong ground organizations. Silence. I tried again on Wednesday. Silence. Calls to Webb’s campaign headquarters (listed as a post office box) brought me to three different voicemail boxes, and a message wasn’t returned.

While I didn’t get to talk to Crawford, he told the Washington Post in May that Webb’s campaign has about a dozen paid staffers and volunteers. Then, in August, he told the Boston Globe that Webb was adding three more people to his staff. Two of them, Iowa director Joe Stanley and social media and veterans’ coordinator Joe Chenelly, didn’t respond to messages through their publicly available email addresses. Anastasia Apa, who supposedly raises money for Webb, referred me back to Crawford.

I did finally manage to exchange emails with Dave “Mudcat” Saunders, a longtime Webb adviser who worked on his 2006 Senate campaign. Saunders described himself as a “friend and supporter” of Webb’s, but said he had no official role on the campaign.

“I am not an official spokesperson for Jim,” he wrote. There seems to be a lot of that going around in Webb’s world.

But Webb will still be on stage at the Democratic debate next Tuesday, and there’s no Republican-style kids’ table to separate him from the front-runners. He argues his direct, no-BS style is what most Americans want, and the debate will be the first chance for almost everyone in the country to hear it. Whether that equates to a real campaign is a different question.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate