Chris Christie Says It Took a Natural Disaster for Him to See He Could be President

It’s all part of his fierce attack on Marco Rubio and Donald Trump.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP Photo

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


In a Bedford, New Hampshire, warehouse filled with several hundred supporters, Chris Christie on Saturday morning said that four years ago he was asked to run for president—begged to run for president—by associates, politicos, and funders. But, he recounted, he resisted these calls. Why? “I knew, in my heart, I was not ready to run for president,” Christie told the crowd. But the Christie boosters back then persisted. Don’t worry if you don’t have the experience yet, he said they told him, just get into the White House and then figure out what to do. But Christie said to his supporters that was not his way: “The politically popular thing to do when you see an opening is to run for it.” But he hung tough and told all these acolytes that he did not yet have the chops to be commander in chief. Then came his big break: Superstorm Sandy.

In a speech mainly focused on dismissing his rivals as untested and not prepared to be president—he called Trump an “entertainer-in-chief” and mocked one-term senators, such as Marco Rubio, for knowing how to haggle over amendments but not how to manage real-life crises—Christie repeatedly proclaimed that he was a true leader and that he knew he could handle whatever the world throws his way. That’s why he would be a great commander in chief. And the reason he realized this now—after his moment of doubt four years ago—is that, as governor, he guided New Jersey through that awful storm.

Surrounded by Republican governors Larry Hogan of Maryland and Charlie Baker of Massachusetts, Christie described in vivid detail how he had managed his state’s response to Hurricane Sandy. “I will tell you one thing, there’s no one on that stage, not one of us that faced the kind of crisis that New Jersey faced in October of 2012,” Christie bragged. “This was not a summer hurricane… And the next day it was cold and it got colder!”

Over and over, Christie discounted the legislative work of senators. Do they, he asked, get calls at 4:00 am about crises and disasters? No, he answered. No one, he pointed out, ever calls a senator in the middle of the night to say, “Your bill has not come out of the subcommittee.” And do these senators have to make tough calls, at a moment’s notice, on which lives depend? No way. They do not know the loneliness of being the chief executive. “After they give you that briefing when you’re governor,” Christie said, “the next morning here’s what happens…the table gets quiet and they all look at you and they say, ‘What do we do now governor?’ There’s no way a roll call vote in the United States Senate prepares you to deal with that.”

Christie repeatedly poked at Rubio in this fashion. At one point, he compared the Senate to a grade school. In the Senate, he said with a smirk, a legislator is told when to show up, what desk to sit at, what questions to review before a test (that is, a hearing), and when to take a recess. With much scorn, Christie noted that the GOP nomination should not go “to someone who memorizes a good 60-second answer.” He was referring to Marco Rubio. The not-too-subtle message: Trump is a clown, Rubio is a immature poser, and neither should be put in charge of the United States government and its military. His rivals are pretenders, and Christie deserves this job because he’s been a strong governor who passed the Sandy test.

There is something curious about Christie’s Sandy-heavy argument. After all, it was President Barack Obama—a one-term senator prior to the presidency—who helped Christie cope with the ravages of Sandy. So much so that Christie at one point gave Obama that now famous bear hug. In fact in 2013, Christie told the Bergen Record this version of what it was like sitting around the table after Sandy struck:

That first call came, Christie recalled, as he and his team were struggling to come to terms with the depth of the destruction as it became evident in television images showing houses in the middle of Route 35 and scenes of the ocean meeting the bay in Mantoloking.

The president asked if he could visit the state.

“If you understand the emotional condition we were all in, all of us in this administration sitting around that table watching that, you’d understand that very soon thereafter, probably two or three hours after that, he called for the first time,” Christie said. “I’m like, man, ‘Can I come?’ Tell me where and when and I’ll be there. I need your help.”

Yes, once upon a time, Christie was quite appreciative of that former one-term senator in the White House. Seems like that fellow did a pretty good job. Still, in the home stretch before New Hampshire votes, Christie was pushing one big theme: he’s a leader and his Sandy experience qualifies him to command the men and women of the armed services. Without that storm, who knows whether Christie would have become the well-prepped leader he is today and realized that he is indeed presidential material?

For all the talk about coping with that calamity, Christie ended his speech with an odd reference to natural disasters. He vowed to “burn Washington, DC, down, because it deserves it.” He then added that after demolishing the nation’s capital, he would be “the person to rebuild it.” Perhaps he learned how to do that, too, thanks to Sandy.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate