These Are the Stakes in the New York Primary

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton look for big wins in their home state.

Hillary Clinton leads a rally at a Manhattan hotel.Seth Wenig/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Hillary Clinton stood three blocks from Trump Tower on Monday and gave a speech whose target was not her challenger for the Democrats’ nomination, Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, but Republicans Donald Trump and Ted Cruz. “They don’t think we need to raise the minimum wage,” she said. “They don’t believe equal pay is a problem. They sure don’t want to move toward paid family leave.” What they want, she said, is “to strip us of the rights we already have.”

She sounded ready to launch into the general election and put an unexpectedly hard-fought primary behind her. The best state to help her do just that is New York. But if she doesn’t win decisively, a pivot to the general election, if she is the nominee, could be a ways off.

Speaking at a “Women for Hillary” rally at a Hilton Hotel in Manhattan, Clinton was welcomed by an audience of true believers. Two women in the back of the large room shouted, “Yes, yes!” and “It’s true!” in approval throughout her speech. On more than one occasion, attendees embarking on side conversations were shushed by other rallygoers. The crowd, many of them campaign volunteers, said they expected Clinton to do well on Tuesday. But for Clinton, who spent eight years as one of the state’s senators, the New York primary has turned into a slog.

The Clinton campaign has not left anything to chance. In the race’s final days, Clinton, as well as Chelsea Clinton and Bill Clinton, have held events across the state and in the city’s five boroughs. Jay Jacobs, the chairman of the Nassau County Democrats and a Clinton supporter, says the campaign has done a good job preparing for the primary. “It’s reached out to the right people, it’s engaging the right constituency groups: It’s linked up with sympathetic unions, certainly members of the clergy in the African American community and Latino communities, and I would say women’s groups and other progressive groups that have been natural allies,” he said. “All of these groups have been coalescing around the get-out-the-vote operation.”

But Sanders has been steadily gaining on Clinton. While Clinton once lead by about 30 points, polls have shown the race tighten over the past few weeks; the Real Clear Politics polling average now puts Clinton’s lead at 12 percentage points. While Clinton has typically hosted modestly sized events, Sanders has repeatedly drawn crowds that would be impressive for a general election candidate—according to the campaign, 18,000 in the Bronx, 27,000 in Washington Square Park, and more than 28,000 in Brooklyn’s Prospect Park. And his campaign has the support of New York’s Working Families Party and their formidable get-out-the-vote operation.

At the end of the day, however, the nomination comes down to delegate math, and at this point in the race that means that New York favors Clinton. Party rules allotting delegates on a proportional basis will make it very hard for the winner to make off with substantially more delegates than their opponent, absent a landslide victory. In most congressional districts, for example, the victor would have to earn more than 57 percent of the vote to win more delegates than the runner-up. So even if Sanders exceeds expectations, New York is not likely to help him narrow Clinton’s lead in delegates won through primaries and caucuses. (Clinton is beating Sanders by 1,307 to 1,094 among such pledged delegates; her progress toward amassing 2,383 delegates, the number to secure the nomination, is boosted by the 469 superdelegates who have pledged to support her, versus the 31 backing Sanders.)

New York’s Republican contest Tuesday also comes down to delegate math. The question is not whether Trump will win, but by how much. Unlike earlier winner-take-all Republican contests in major states, New York’s GOP allocates its delegates proportionally. Trump’s margin of victory in New York will help decide whether he will walk into the Republicans’ Cleveland convention with enough support to win the nomination outright, or whether he’ll fall just short, leaving the front-runner vulnerable to being denied the nomination at a historic contested convention. (Trump currently has 743 of the 1,237 delegates necessary to clinch the party’s nod. Texas Sen. Cruz trails with 543 and Ohio Gov. Kasich is far behind with 144.)

The most important numbers for Trump, Cruz, and Kasich in New York are 50 and 20. The state party awards three delegates in each congressional district and 14 at-large delegates. If a candidate gets more than 50 percent of the vote in a given district, they take all three delegates. But if the winner nets under 50 percent, he takes two delegates and the second-place finisher takes one. Candidates who get less than 20 percent are not eligible for any delegates from that district. The same math applies to the state’s 14 at-large delegates: If Trump gets over 50 percent statewide, he takes them all; otherwise, they are divided proportionally among every candidate who exceeds 20 percent.

So the big question for Republicans is whether Trump will hit 50 percent statewide. It’s unclear how many districts he can win with an outright majority, thereby shutting out Kasich and Cruz from delegates. Meanwhile, Cruz and Kasich will be struggling to top 20 percent across the state, and in most districts. “Cruz has a very limited constituency in New York,” says Republican consultant Jay Townsend. “He is such a social conservative, and they don’t run well here. It’s not Alabama.”

Though Kasich is far behind in the delegate race, he can do well enough to do significant damage to Cruz’s push for delegates. Kasich could beat out Cruz for second place in districts both upstate and in New York City, or even nab first place in a few New York City districts.

Going into Tuesday, the Real Clear Politics polling average put Trump at 53 percent, Kasich at 23 percent, and Cruz at 18 percent—under the critical 20 percent threshold. “Kasich is probably more in line with the majority of New York Republicans intellectually, ideologically, so I think Kasich will be a great inhibitor for Ted Cruz in New York,” says Bill O’Reilly, a Republican strategist in the state. “I think Kasich may do better than expected.”

For Republicans, “the headlines are less significant than the delegates that come out of New York,” says O’Reilly. For Democrats, it’s the reverse. The math is already in Clinton’s favor. She just needs the headline to prove it.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate