Family of Black Woman Killed in Police Standoff Disputes Official Account

A wrongful-death lawsuit filed this week raises questions about how and why Korryn Gaines was shot.

Screenshot of a video recorded by Korryn Gaines during a March 2016 traffic stop by policeKorryn Gaines

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


On Tuesday, the family of Korryn Gaines, the woman killed during a standoff with police in her Randallstown, Maryland, apartment last month, filed a lawsuit against the Baltimore County Police Department alleging wrongful death. The lawsuit, brought by Gaines’ mother and boyfriend, the father of her five-year-old son, alleges that Baltimore County police officers illegally entered Gaines’ apartment, used excessive force, and violated Gaines’ right to free speech by shutting down her Facebook page as she posted videos of the encounter online. The suit seeks $2 million in damages from the officer who shot Gaines and Baltimore County.

On the morning of August 1, Baltimore County police officers arrived at Gaines’ apartment to serve her with an arrest warrant for skipping out on a court hearing related to traffic and misdemeanor charges that arose from a traffic stop. They also sought to serve Gaines’ boyfriend with an arrest warrant on unrelated charges.

According to statements from the Baltimore County police chief at a press conference after the shooting, the officers opened Gaines’ door using a key from her building manager after they heard people inside but no one answered the door. A chain lock prevented officers from entering. But the officers called in a SWAT team after seeing through the door opening that Gaines was seated on the floor with a shotgun and a child nearby, according to the chief. The team kicked in the door, the Baltimore Sun reported, and attempted to negotiate with Gaines for several hours. Gaines aimed her gun in the officers’ direction and verbally threatened them multiple times during the standoff, according to the Baltimore County PD. (It remains unclear how the police were positioned in relation to Gaines throughout the ordeal.) When Gaines eventually pointed her gun at an officer and said she was going to kill him if he didn’t leave, an officer shot at her. Gaines returned fire, and an officer fired again, killing Gaines, according to the police. Gaines’ five-year-old son was also struck in the cheek and elbow but survived. Gaines’ boyfriend, Kareem Courtney, had fled from the back of the apartment with another child and was arrested before the shooting occurred.

A neighbor alleges that the last thing he heard before an officer shot at Gaines was one of the officers saying, “I’m sick of this shit.”

But the Gaines family’s lawsuit raises questions about the police department’s account. According to the lawsuit, Baltimore County police officers commandeered the apartment of Gaines’ next-door neighbor Ramone Coleman during the standoff and set up surveillance equipment so they could monitor what Gaines was doing. Officers did not let Coleman or his infant daughter leave during the standoff, the lawsuit alleges. Coleman said that at one point he heard Gaines say she would come out if officers put their guns down and backed away from her apartment—a request they ignored—according to the suit. He also said police turned away some of Gaines’ relatives who sought to help convince her to cooperate. And Coleman alleges that the last thing he heard before an officer shot at Gaines was one of the officers saying, “I’m sick of this shit.”

The lawsuit accuses the police department of failing to call in its crisis intervention team even after officers saw Gaines inside her apartment with a gun and a child. The team can be deployed for incidents involving suicidal or mentally ill subjects or a “situational crisis,” according to the lawsuit—something the police department concedes it did not do.

During the standoff, Gaines recorded several videos and posted them to Facebook, until the social-media company complied with law enforcement’s request during the standoff to deactivate her account. Police officials have said some users were commenting on Gaines’ videos and encouraging her not to cooperate with them, which they said was interfering with their attempt to negotiate a peaceful end to the standoff. The lawsuit further contends that Gaines’ right to free speech was violated by the shutdown of her Facebook account, which “stopped the only independent visual record of what was taking place before [the officer] killed her.”

Baltimore County police officials have only released the last name, Ruby, of the officer who shot Gaines. That officer is a 16-year veteran of the police department and was also involved in another 2007 shooting, according to the Associated Press.

A spokeswoman for the Baltimore County PD declined to comment on the pending litigation. The spokeswoman previously told the Baltimore Sun that the department had confirmed that its officers met all the legal criteria necessary for them to enter Gaines’ apartment and serve an arrest warrant.

You can read the full lawsuit below.

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate