North Carolina GOP Goes Nuclear on the NCAA Over Bathroom Bill Response

“I wish the NCAA was this concerned about the women who were raped at Baylor.”

Jacob Kupferman/CSM/ZUMA Wire

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Update 9/14/16, 1:46 p.m.: The Atlantic Coast Conference on Wednesday announced it would pull all championships from North Carolina for the 2016-17 academic year over the state’s bathroom bill.

Tensions over North Carolina’s infamous “bathroom bill” exploded on Monday, as the NCAA announced it would move seven championship events out of the state and the North Carolina Republican Party responded by accusing the collegiate sports association of “political peacocking” and endangering women.

Gov. Pat McCrory signed the sweeping anti-LGBT bill, known as HB2, into law in March. The measure strips workplace discrimination protections from the state’s workers and requires transgender people to use bathrooms corresponding to their biological sex, not their gender identity. In response, the National Basketball Association announced in July that it was relocating its annual All-Star Game from Charlotte to New Orleans, costing Charlotte an estimated $100 million in economic benefits. Businesses from PayPal to Deutsche Bank have called off expansion plans in the state, and musicians, including Bruce Springsteen, have canceled shows in protest.

On Monday, the NCAA announced it would move its March basketball tournament and six other championship events from the state “because of the cumulative actions taken by the state concerning civil rights protections.”

The North Carolina Republican Party responded swiftly and fiercely, defending the law in an incisive rebuke of the NCAA for “political peacocking.” In a statement, state GOP spokesperson Kami Mueller said:

This is so absurd it’s almost comical. I genuinely look forward to the NCAA merging all men’s and women’s teams together as singular, unified, unisex teams. Under the NCAA’s logic, colleges should make cheerleaders and football players share bathrooms, showers and hotel rooms. This decision is an assault to female athletes across the nation. If you are unwilling to have women’s bathrooms and locker rooms, how do you have a women’s team? I wish the NCAA was this concerned about the women who were raped at Baylor. Perhaps the NCAA should stop with their political peacocking and instead focus their energies on making sure our nation’s collegiate athletes are safe, both on and off the field.

In the hours following the NCAA’s decision, McCrory did not issue a public statement.

In explaining its decision, the NCAA’s board of governors noted that the state law offered protections for public officials to “deny services to the LGBT community.” It pointed out that five states had banned public employees and “representatives of public institutions” from traveling to North Carolina in response to the law, and that in July, the University of Albany announced it had canceled a November 12 game against Duke University following an executive order signed by New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo that barred travel to North Carolina. At the time, Duke head coach Mike Krzyzewski called the North Carolina law “embarrassing.”  

“Fairness is about more than the opportunity to participate in college sports, or even compete for championships,” said NCAA President Mark Emmert in a press release. “We believe in providing a safe and respectful environment at our events and are committed to providing the best experience possible for college athletes, fans and everyone taking part in our championships.” In an interview with CBS on Tuesday, Emmert called the decision to move a “no-brainer.” When asked about Mueller’s comments regarding the association’s handling of sexual assaults, Emmert said, “The two issues are completely unrelated. The HB2 decision is one that engenders opinions on both sides of the aisle. It’s a political season. That’s unfortunate, and people are going to have these types of comments.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate