The Voting Records in 20 States May Have Been Hacked. But What Does That Mean?

Activity has “reached a threshold of some concern.”

Imago/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


As November 8 approaches, election officials around the country have had to cope with increasing concerns about the security of state voter registration systems. The Department of Homeland Security estimates that hackers have attempted to access voter registration and administration systems in 20 states, and these states and three others have asked the government agency for help with adding extra security to their systems. Adding to the worries were the alleged Russian hacks of Democratic organizations and officials over the summer.

Congressional Democrats have been pushing the White House to publicly blame Russia for the Democratic hacks, and some administration officials have alluded to Russia’s role in public, but no official blame has been laid. John Carlin, the assistant attorney general for national security, told CNN on Monday that he could not confirm any responsible party, but he hinted that the US government has a good idea who is behind the hacks.

“To those outside our borders who are thinking that they can mess with fundamental American institutions or values…we can and will find you,” Carlin said. “And when we do there will be consequences.” Those consequences, he added, range from criminal prosecution to sanctions.

Even as awareness is growing, only the systems in Arizona and Illinois have actually been accessed. A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson didn’t respond to questions about how many states’ systems have been involved and to what extent their systems have been breached, if at all. On August 29, Yahoo News reported the FBI had warned election officials that voter registration data in at least one state had been stolen and that there had been attempts to access registration data in another state. Last week, Politico reported that in “20-plus states…intrusion attempts have become what DHS calls ‘probing of concern'”—the way hackers routinely scan computer systems looking for vulnerabilities is known as “probing.”

A DHS source told Politico that the activity has “reached a threshold of some concern” and all states are “constantly targeted,” but added that the growing hype in the media about hackers trying to swing elections has gotten “blown out of proportion.” The information accessed by the hackers in Illinois (and to a lesser degree, in Arizona) was related to voter registration data, the same kind that is public in many states. In an open letter posted September 26, the National Association of Secretaries of State—which includes the top election officials in 40 states—wrote that the highly decentralized nature of the country’s 9,000-plus election jurisdictions makes it unlikely that election outcomes could be manipulated by hackers. “Machines are standalone and do NOT connect to the internet,” the letter reads. That lack of centrality makes it hard to swing an election because “there is no central point of entry and NO NATIONAL SYSTEM to be attacked.”

Two days later, a bipartisan group of congressional leaders wrote a letter to the National Association of State Election Directors. “States face the challenge of malefactors that are seeking to use cyberattacks to disrupt the administration of our elections,” they wrote, urging the state directors to take full advantage of commercially available tools to secure their systems as well as the help offered by the DHS, which includes risk and vulnerability assessments, information sharing, the dispatch of field-based security advisers, and remote scans of states’ systems.

A major vulnerability in several states’ voting systems has nothing to do with hacking. As reported by Mother Jones nearly two months ago, as many as one-fifth of all voters in the United States live in jurisdictions where voting machines leave no voter-verified paper audit trail. If the machine were to miscount votes or lose vote data, those votes would be lost forever.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate