The Richest Man in Congress Held on to His Seat—Barely

After embracing Trump, California Rep. Darrell Issa enjoyed a narrow victory.

Rep. Darrell Issa returning to the House Oversight Committee's offices in June 2013.Cliff Owen/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


For the first time, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) had to work to keep his seat. On Tuesday, he eked out a narrow victory against his Democratic challenger, Doug Applegate, beating him 51 to 49. 

Even as Donald Trump sailed to victory, he may have helped weaken Issa’s grip on California’s 49th district, where the wealthiest member of Congress has served effectively unchallenged for 16 years. Back in February, Issa warned that Trump could have a toxic effect on down-ballot Republicans seeking reelection. Issa even suggested that Trump could be “a national Todd Akin” for the wider Republican Party. Then, against his own advice, he embraced The Donald and joined Trump’s national security advisory board on the same day that the world heard Trump bragging about grabbing women “by the pussy.”

In his seven previous elections, Issa didn’t even have to put out yard signs, so safely insulated was he in the Republican-leaning district that spans northern San Diego County and southern Orange County, an expanse of golden sand beaches and coastal bluffs that has long been the realm of highly educated, well-off white people. “Darrell never participated before. He’s never been involved in our Republican campaigning, because he was so safe,” Republican Oceanside Councilman Jerry Kern told me earlier this month.

Issa  joined Trump’s national security advisory board on the same day that the world heard Trump bragging about grabbing women “by the pussy.”

But redistricting in 2012 and a growing Latino population has slowly pulled the region leftward. In this ridiculous election year, Trump left plenty of the area’s Republicans without a top-of-the-ticket contender to rally behind. An August poll found that Trump had a 60 percent unfavorable rating in Issa’s district. Another showed Hillary Clinton with a 14-point lead. Yet Jason Roe, a San Diego-based political consultant, said he was skeptical of Trump’s threat to candidates like Issa. “Do people vote based on that? I don’t think voters are holding down-ballot Republicans accountable for Trump,” he said.

Applegate came out of nowhere to trail Issa by just five points in the June primary. It could have been a wake-up call, but the message didn’t seem to reach Team Issa. His campaign was described as “mystifyingly bad” and incredibly slow. “It’s being run like a 1980s campaign,” Francine Busby, the chair of the San Diego Democratic Party, told me in late October. “He hasn’t been visible and active.” The campaign didn’t start running ads until October. One political operative described them as “the worst fucking TV ads I’ve ever seen in my life.”

In the few weeks running up to the election, Issa suddenly went into full campaign mode. He rode his bicycle throughout the district, stopping for photo ops; he attended private fundraisers and visited a food bank and the Camp Pendleton Marine Base. One thing he never did, however, was withdraw his support for Trump. And that decision has paid off. “You gotta remember: Darrell outdid Romney in the district,” Oceanside Councilman Jerry Kern told me. “I’m sure he’ll outdo Trump this time.” Sure enough, Trump took just 39 percent of the vote in San Diego County and 44 percent in Orange County.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate