Jeff Sessions Fought Against Hate Crime Protections for LGBT Victims

Now, as attorney general, he could undermine those protections.

Sen. Jeff Sessions speaks to media at Trump Tower in New York on November 17.AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Civil rights groups were horrified last week when Donald Trump announced that he would nominate Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) to be his attorney general. Sessions—who was the first US senator to endorse Trump and advised the president-elect throughout his campaign—is best known in civil rights circles for his aggressive anti-immigration stances and a series of racist comments he allegedly made early in his career. But there’s another area where he has staunchly opposed an expansion of civil right protections, and where he could hold outsize power as attorney general: LGBT rights.

Sessions ardently opposed the 2009 Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act. The act extended federal hate crime protections to people victimized because of their sexual orientation, gender or gender identity, or disability. (Federal law already covered race, ethnicity, and religion as protected classes.) It also expanded the kinds of crimes that could be federally prosecuted under the hate crime statute, as well as the feds’ potential involvement in those prosecutions.

The bill passed over Sessions’ objections—but now he could effectively neutralize it as attorney general. The law mandated that the attorney general—or a designee—sign off on all criminal prosecutions brought under the act. Given Sessions’ opposition to the bill, some civil rights groups fear that, as attorney general, Sessions would not aggressively enforce the law. “I think it remains a legitimate question as to how vigorous Mr. Sessions will be in prosecuting a statute that he was one of the chief opponents of,” says Brian Levin, director of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University.

The FBI documented a 7 percent increase in hate crimes in 2015. Hate crimes against Muslims spiked 67 percent. But members of the LGBT community are more likely to be the victims of hate crimes than any other group. Last week, more than 60 members of Congress wrote to the Department of Justice, urging Attorney General Loretta Lynch and FBI Director James Comey to take steps to improve hate crime reporting. Around 90 percent of the nation’s nearly 18,500 law enforcement agencies did not report hate crimes to the FBI last year or reported that there were zero hate crimes in their jurisdiction.

In a speech on the Senate floor in July 2009 (see the first two videos below), Sessions said people should not be attacked because of their sexual orientation or gender, but he argued that federal prosecution of such attacks was unnecessary because there was no evidence that they weren’t being prosecuted adequately at the state and local levels. He also quoted a letter sent to Congress by the Civil Rights Commission claiming that trying individuals for the same crime at both the state and federal levels—which the law would permit by federalizing certain hate crimes—violated the spirit of the Constitution’s ban on double jeopardy, even if it was not technically unconstitutional.

But Sessions also expressed a bizarre fixation on the bill’s effect on prosecution of rape cases throughout the country (see the third video below).  Sessions cited the Commission letter to argue that the bill’s hate crime protections would be triggered not only when the perpetrator of a crime had an animus toward a particular group, but also whenever the victim happened to be a member of a particular group. “That could give federal jurisdiction, for the first time in history, to every rape that occurs in America,” Sessions said—now expressing his own concerns—because rapists often pick their victims because they are women.

He went on to suggest that the bill violated the equal protection clause of the Constitution by imposing different penalties on rapists depending on their motivations. “Is a legitimate justifiable reason to punish one rape differently than another rape, simply because someone decided that the first rape was committed out of hate—or actually, because of the gender of the victim?” he asked. “I think the victims would say the same thing: The criminal should be punished to the fullest extent of the law.”

The hate crime law in the state of Alabama does not include sexual orientation or gender identity among its protected classes. Most of the state’s police departments also do not report hate crimes to the FBI. In 2015, Alabama, with a population of nearly 4.9 million, reported just 10 hate crimes. Police departments in neighboring Tennessee, with a population of about 6.6 million, reported 221.

Watch Sessions’ floor speech challenging the hate crime act below.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate