Trump Team Falsely Claims Support of Civil Rights Advocates for Jeff Sessions

The people listed have largely fought against civil rights.

John Bazemore/AP, File

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Jeff Sessions, the senator from Alabama whom President-elect Donald Trump has chosen to be the next attorney general, is best known for his hardline anti-immigration policies and allegations of racist remarks in his past. In an apparent attempt to soften that reputation, Trump’s transition team is boasting that civil rights groups are “strongly supporting” Sessions’ nomination.

That statement is broadly false: Civil rights groups have spoken out very critically of Sessions’ nomination. But in order to make its claim, the Trump team put out a press release citing the support of people who, upon closer examination, actively oppose civil rights for immigrants and people of color.

The press release announced the support of “civil rights and law enforcement groups.” But no group on the list is dedicated to promoting civil rights. There are just three individuals on the list who could plausibly be tied to civil rights—but they’re not civil rights advocates.

One is Leah Durant, whom the campaign describes as a “Civil Rights Attorney and founder of the Black American Leadership Alliance.” Durant has long worked in anti-immigration and nativist circles. In the mid-2000s, she worked for the legal arm of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), an anti-immigration group founded by the racist white nationalist John Tanton. Until April, Durant ran a group called Progressives for Immigration Reform, which claims that immigration is bad for the environment. Anti-immigrant activists and white nationalists regularly attended the group’s gatherings. Durant’s Black American Leadership Alliance seems to have popped up in the spring of 2013 to oppose the bipartisan effort to pass comprehensive immigration reform at the time. The group argued that immigration pits Latino immigrants against African Americans in a fight for jobs. Like Durant, many of the group’s members have ties to FAIR.

The Trump team also listed attorney Peter Kirsanow, a Republican appointee on the US Commission on Civil Rights. Kirsanow used that position for years to investigate—and push the Justice Department to investigate—the New Black Panther Party. On Election Day 2008, two members of the militant group stood outside a Philadelphia polling place, leading to years of accusations by conservatives of voter intimidation. Kirsanow opposes affirmative action; according to the Huffington Post, when the late Justice Antonin Scalia famously suggested that black college students should seek “less-advanced” or “slower-track” institutions, he was referring to a brief by Kirsanow.

Also on the list is Robert Driscoll, who served in the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department in the George W. Bush administration, when the division was politicized and failed to vigorously enforce civil rights laws. After leaving the Justice Department, he signed a 2008 letter asking the Civil Rights Division to investigate and prosecute voter fraud, including the group ACORN. As a private lawyer in 2010, he defended Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona, who is infamous for his brutal treatment of Latinos and immigrants, against charges of racial profiling. (A judge found Arpiao guilty in 2013. Arpiao was charged with criminal contempt of court disobeying that order and lost his reelection bid in 2016, after 24 years on the job.) More recently, Driscoll represented Republican North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory in his effort to defend his infamous “bathroom bill,” which not only prohibited transgender people from using the bathroom corresponding to their gender identity but also rolled back basic protections for LGBT individuals in the state. The Justice Department sued North Carolina over the bill, and with Driscoll’s help, McCrory also sued the Justice Department, though he later withdrew the suit.

The Trump transition team is bragging about these people’s support for Sessions in what appears to be an effort to claim he will defend Americans’ civil rights. The real message might be the opposite one.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate