Here’s How the Senate Health Bill Will Make the Opioid Crisis Even More Devastating

The bill spends a pittance on solving the opioid epidemic

Senate Majority leader Mitch McConnell after announcing the release of the Republicans' healthcare billJ. Scott Applewhite/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Thursday morning, Senate Republicans released their highly anticipated plan to repeal and replace Obamacare, titled the Better Care Reconciliation Act of 2017. The legislation quickly drew criticism from drug policy experts and politicians who worry that the bill cuts substance abuse and mental health services amidst a spiraling opioid epidemic. Drug overdoses killed 52,404 Americans in 2015 and  roughly 60,000 Americans last year—more than car accidents or gun violence. 

“I hope our Senators ask themselves—what will happen to the Americans grappling with opioid addiction who suddenly lose their coverage?” former President Barack Obama wrote in a Facebook post about the Senate bill.

Here are the basics about how the legislation would affect addiction services: 

Provides “a joke” of substance abuse funding

As Senate Republicans were drafting the bill, two Republicans, Ohio’s Rob Portman and West Virginia’s Shelley Moore Capito, requested $45 billion over 10 years to address the opioid epidemic. But the Senate bill offers just $2 billion, in 2018 alone, for mental health and substance and treatment. The funding amounts to “a joke,” says Richard Frank, a Harvard health economics professor. Frank estimates that it would cost $183 billion over ten years to cover the cost of opioid addiction treatment and the illnesses that frequently come along with it (like hepatitis C and HIV)  for those who would lose coverage if Obamacare is repealed. That number is based on Medicaid data showing that the typical Medicaid recipient with opioid use disorder costs between $11,000 and $12,000 per year. 

Slashes Medicaid funding

Medicaid, which provides insurance coverage for more than 70 million Americans, is the largest payer for addiction services across the country. In some states hard hit by the opioid epidemic, like West Virginia and Ohio, Medicaid pays for more than 40 percent of the buprenorphine, a life-saving opioid addiction medication, consumed in the states. 

Medicaid works as a matching program: the federal government matches state Medicaid spending to provide coverage to its poorest residents, with no limit on how much money the federal government will spend. The Senate bill would, for the first time, put a cap on how much money federal government grants states under Medicaid. There isn’t yet an analysis of exactly how much money this will cut from Medicaid, but when the House included a similar provision in the bill it passed last month, the Congressional Budget Office projected that it would cut Medicaid spending by $834 billion over the next decade.

Eliminating that funding would be particularly crippling for many of the communities that voted Trump into office, says Keith Humphreys, a Stanford University psychiatry professor who advised the Obama administration on drug policy. As he said this spring, “This will hurt the worst in the places that supported these politicians the most. They voted in this Congress that is now going to stick a knife in them.”

Repeals Medicaid expansion by 2025

One of the most significant parts of Obamacare was a provision expanding Medicaid to millions more poor Americans. Under the Affordable Care Act, people who earn up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level are eligible for this government-funded insurance program, provided they live in one of the 31 states that elected to expand the program. An additional 11 million Americans have gained insurance coverage through Medicaid expansion. The Senate bill would begin to phase out Medicaid expansion in 2021, with extra funding cut altogether in 2025. 

Medicaid expansion has been a game changer for substance abuse treatment: In states that expanded, the proportion of people with substance abuse or mental health disorders who were hospitalized but not insured fell from 20 percent in 2013 to 5 percent in 2015.

Sunsets “essential” services in Medicaid expansion

Under Obamacare, insurers are required to offer so-called “essential health benefits,” including mental health and substance abuse services. In order to sell insurance, insurers have to cover addiction treatment, contraception, preventative care, and emergency services—here’s the full list. That set of guarantees also applies to how states must structure their Medicaid programs. In 2020, the Senate bill would end essential benefits for people covered under Medicaid expansion.

Critics worry this could would give states the option to not cover substance abuse treatment. The bill would “leave a lot of places to drop substance abuse coverage because it’s cheaper if you don’t take care of peoples’ addiction,” says Keith Humphreys, Stanford University psychiatry professor who advised the Obama administration on drug policy.

As Baltimore health commissioner Leana Wen said in a statement shortly after the bill’s release: “Insurers can stop providing coverage for mental health and addiction services. At a time of a public health emergency around opioid overdose, this will cost millions more lives.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate