The Expected Trump Crackdown on Dreamers Hasn’t Materialized

And right-wing activists and media are not happy about it.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Last month, as immigrants across the country worried about what Donald Trump’s presidency would mean for them, a 29-year-old paralegal in Atlanta named Jessica Colotl got bad news. Colotl had come to the United States from Mexico with her parents, who were undocumented, when she was 11. In 2013, she was approved for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), a program created by the Obama administration in 2012 to allow undocumented immigrants who arrived in the country as children to work legally without fear of being deported. But in May, her deferred action was revoked because of a dismissed felony charge, which government officials referred to as her “criminal history.”

After the election, immigrant rights advocates feared that cases like Colotl’s would be the norm. Instead, data released last week by US Citizenship and Immigration Services suggests that her revoked DACA status was an outlier. From January through March, 17,275 new DACA applications were approved, compared to 18,311 in the final three months of 2016. And on Monday, a federal judge ordered the government to temporarily restore Colotl’s DACA status.

Charles Kuck, Colotl’s attorney and a former president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, says that not much has changed with DACA processing under Trump. The main difference, Kuck says, is that unlike under the Obama administration, Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) now targets DACA recipients—known as Dreamers, after the failed Dream Act legislation that would have had similar effects to DACA—who have been arrested but not convicted of a crime. 

That’s still much less harsh than anticipated. Last August, Trump pledged to “immediately terminate President Obama’s two illegal executive amnesties.” A Politico headline during the campaign captured the general mood: “Dreamers face nightmare of Trump’s deportation force.”

“Everybody assumed that on inauguration day that Trump—including everybody who supported Trump—that he would end the DACA program that day,” Kuck says.   

Following the election, immigration clinics advised clients not to apply for DACA because the data could make it easier for them to be swept up in deportation raids. Advocacy groups, as well as some Republicans, focused their attention on getting the Trump administration to preserve DACA for those who were already protected.

Their campaign seems to be working. In April, Trump told Dreamers they should “rest easy” because his administration is “not after the Dreamers, we are after the criminals.” Still, ICE’s non-criminal arrests spiked by over 150 percent in Trump’s first 100 days.  

Last week, Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly told the House Homeland Security Committee that he hoped Congress would find a permanent legislative solution in light of DACA’s bipartisan support. Kuck now advises his clients to apply for DACA.

Right-wing activists and media are hammering Trump over the reversal. The Conservative Review called the Dreamer numbers a “scandal” and a “betrayal.”  Referring to Kelly, William Gheen, a conservative immigration activist, told the Washington Times, â€śFire this illegal alien amnesty backer.” The right-wing Twittersphere was similarly incensed.

Up to 1.7 million youths are eligible for DACA, making up a small percentage of America’s 11 million undocumented immigrantsAt a congressional hearing on Tuesday, ICE’s acting director, Thomas Homan, made clear that they still have no reason to rest easy. “If you are in this country illegally, and you committed a crime by entering this country, you should be uncomfortable, you should look over your shoulder, and you need to be worried,”  Homan said

Homan had a simple explanation for why non-criminal arrests are up: “We weren’t allowed to arrest them in the past administration.” Arresting criminals isn’t enough, he said. “If we wait for them to violate yet another law against the citizens of this country, it’s late. We shouldn’t wait.”

Jose Magaña-Salgado, the managing policy attorney at the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, warns that DACA isn’t “out of the woods” yet. “DACA remains in danger,” he says. “This is a very anti-immigrant administration.”

He adds, “Individuals should not have a sense of complacency.”

Kuck is more optimistic. Even extreme anti-immigration groups “don’t want to parade a bunch of kids in handcuffs out of the country,” he says. “It’s just a bad image.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate