All These Grown Men In Texas Are Obsessed With Bathrooms for Some Reason

A history.

3D rendering of the flag of Texas on satin texture.ronniechua/Getty/mrtom-uk/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Texas lawmakers have gone into overtime with a 30-day special session that largely came about because of a power struggle in the leadership over the issue of whether transgender people should be able to use the bathroom that best aligns with their gender. The state Senate has already passed a measure to do just that, but the proposal and others like it are likely to stall in the House.  

The battle lines were drawn after Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick forced the special session in order to severely limit the rights of transgender people in the state (as well as reform property taxes). Governor Greg Abbott backed him up and called lawmakers back to the statehouse, but House Speaker Joe Straus has been pushing back. Standing with transgender advocates and business leaders who argue the legislation will lead to backlash and hurt the state’s economy, he has opposed the bill and short-circuited its advancement. 

When two senators were apparently sent by Patrick to discuss the anti-transgender proposals leading up to the special session, Straus was having none of it. ā€œIā€™m disgusted by all this,” he said, as reported by the New Yorker. “Tell the lieutenant governor I donā€™t want the suicide of a single Texan on my hands.” (A spokesperson for Patrick disputes that he sent the senators.)

When the session got underway last week, hundreds of people appeared at the statehouse to testify on Republican state Sen. Lois Kolkhorst’s bill, which would force transgender people to use the bathrooms and locker rooms that correspond with their birth certificates in government buildings and public schools. The proposed legislation would also prohibit transgender students from participating in athletic activities with other students of their gender. Most who showed up were vehemently opposed to the measure.

Throughout the emotional ten-hour hearing, transgender advocates and their families begged lawmakers to consider the consequences the legislation would have on the mental health and physical safety of transgender Texans. Many testified the legislation would force them or their loved ones to break the law or out themselves in public spaces, which, they explained, would put them at great risk given the high rates of violence against transgender people. 

Some of the most powerful testimony came from a young transgender person. “You guys have heard a lot of statistics about the 40 percent of transgender students who attempt suicide,” they testified before the State Affairs committee. “I have also been in that situation, and that is something that only my very closest friend knows, not even my parents.” The young person wished “that I could say that I was really happy I made it through that, but at times itā€™s really hard to be happy when you live in a world that tells you ā€˜You donā€™t exist and your life matters less than the lives of other people around you.ā€™”

After the hearing, the committee voted to move the measure forward for the full Senate where, early Wednesday morning, it passed in a 21-10 vote. But in the House, Speaker Straus is expected to stonewall the legislation. 

Straus, a Republican from the San Antonio area, has opposed Patrickā€™s efforts for nearly as long as they’ve existed. Initially he declined to openly challenge Patrick. ā€œThis isn’t the most urgent concern of mine,” Straus said at a Texas Tribune event shortly after November’s election, but in January, he asked business leaders to ā€œspeak upā€ if they had concerns about what the impact of the legislation might be on them.  

When lawmakers began their session in January, it marked the beginning of five months of political gamesmanship during which the legislation toggled between being advanced and blocked. In March, the Senate, with the lieutenant governor at the helm, passed the anti-transgender legislation, but Patrick knew it faced an uphill battle in the House. “I think the Speaker is out of touch with the voters,” Patrick complained the following day during an interview with a Dallas radio station. “This is an issue that people, supporters, constituents, voters want.” 

In May, before the Texas legislature ended its regular session, Patrick threatened to force a special session if bathroom legislation wasn’t passed. Only then did Straus allow a bathroom measure to advanceā€”but it wasn’t quite what the lieutenant governor had in mind. 

The House bill would have required school districts to provide a private alternative to students who donā€™t want to use the bathroom or locker room of their sex assigned at birth. The bill was vague, seemingly leaving the door open for schools to permit transgender students to use the bathroom of their choice. Straus refused to take the legislation any further. “If the Senate wants to pass a ā€˜bathroom bill,’ it can concur with the bill we passed earlier week,” Straus said during a press conference in May. “The House has compromised enough on this issue.” During another press conference that same day, Patrick said the speakerā€™s compromise was no compromise at all. “Joe Straus is the one causing the special session,” the lieutenant governor said. “I’m just allowing it to happen.”

The lieutenant governor doesnā€™t have the power to call a session, but he ultimately decides whether a bill makes it to the Senate floor. Patrick held hostage legislation unrelated to the bathroom bill that was required to keep a handful of state agencies open, including the Texas Medical Board. Without that bill’s passage, a special session to consider it was all but inevitable; Patrick, though, still had to ensure debate over the bathroom bill would be on the agendaā€”something that can only be set by the governor. 

The Republican governor hasnā€™t taken the guns-blazing approach Patrick has toward transgender rights. In fact, for most of the year’s legislative session, he wouldn’t say whether he supported the discriminatory measures being considered, despite national attention to the issue. He only broke his silence and said he supported the measures in April, after months of debate.

When the governor announced he was calling lawmakers into overtime, Abbott explained it was “because of their inability or refusal to pass a simple law that would prevent the medical profession from shutting down.” Even so, the governor put the bathroom bill on his list of 20 agenda items, giving Patrick another shot. “If I’m going to ask tax payers to foot the bill for a special session,” Abbott said, “I intend to make it count.” 

The move left Straus anything but pleased. In remarks during a Texas Association of School Boards’ conference, he joked about a young boy excited about “a room full of horse manure.”

“The boy said, ‘With all this manure, there must be a pony in here somewhere,'” Straus said. “So I’m going to take the optimistic approach to the special session and keep looking for that pony.”

The House Speaker isn’t being “helpful or professional,” Patrick retorted. “I donā€™t want this to be a battle between us. But Iā€™m not going to let anyone take on Greg Abbott when heā€™s trying to do the will of the people and say itā€™s a bunch of horse manure.”

Despite pressure from Texas’ two most powerful elected leaders, Straus isn’t backing down. Overseeing the House, he has a significant amount of powerā€”perhaps enough to keep the Senate bathroom bills from progressing in his chamber. The House Speaker chooses which committee reviews a bill and appoints the members of each committee. Even if anti-transgender legislation makes it through the first committee, the legislation would proceed to another committee Straus appoints that controls the agenda on the House floor.

Meanwhile, Patrick doesn’t have the same leverage in the special session because he can’t hold the existence of a vital state agency hostage. The governor made keeping the Texas Medical Board and other state agencies open the first item on the agenda and said nothing else could move forward until that passed. In response, the lieutenant governor fast-tracked the legislation, and it passed both houses without delay.

Until the special session ends, pressure will remain on Straus and his peers. The Episcopal Church,  other religious groups, and business leaders are writing to Straus, urging him to stay the course. Some advocates are taking a markedly different approach. Earlier this month, one transgender woman, Ashley Smith, attended an Abbott campaign event and took a picture with the governor. She then posted it online and called him her ā€œbathroom buddy,ā€ noting Texasā€™ top elected official couldnā€™t tell she was a transgender woman. Her Instagram post went viral. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate