Meet the 3 Alabama Republicans Who Want to Replace Jeff Sessions

They are even more extreme.

eelnosiva/Getty Images Plus

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Alabama Republicans head to the polls on Tuesday to decide who will replace Attorney General Jeff Sessions in the US Senate, and the ballot presents a grim set of far-right conservatives as options: a former judge kicked off the bench for defying the Supreme Court’s same-sex marriage decision, a candidate who doesn’t think transgender kids should be able to use the bathroom that best aligns with their gender identity, or a member of Congress who thinks Democrats are waging a “war on whites.”

Unless one of the candidates earns 50 percent of the vote, the primary will likely be rerun next month, thanks to runoff rules. But it is already clear that Republicans in Alabama want to send one of the most conservative senators in the country to Washington—someone who would be even further to the right than Sessions.

The politician currently in that seat would seem to have the upper hand. Sen. Luther Strange is a former state attorney general who was temporarily appointed to the position in February. Strange has Trump’s endorsement in a state where 62 percent of voters cast their ballot for the president in November, and Strange has six times as much campaign cash as the next closest candidate thanks to the backing of the Republican Party, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

But polls ahead of Tuesday have given the edge to Roy Moore, a former judge. Moore posted an 8 percent lead in a poll released last week. Moore has been a national figure among movement conservatives for over a decade, thanks to multiple tumultuous terms sitting on the Alabama Supreme Court, during which Moore branded himself a religious crusader in the culture wars who’s unafraid to buck the rule of law to defend religious freedom.

In 2003, Moore was dismissed from the bench after he refused to remove a 5,280-pound Ten Commandments monument that he had installed at night without permission, despite a court order from another judge who ruled that the religious statue was unconstitutional. Alabama voters reelected Moore to the high court again in 2012, but Moore ignored the rules once more. After the US Supreme Court determined bans on same-sex marriage were unconstitutional in 2015, Moore directed probate judges to not issue marriage licenses, a move that got him suspended for the rest of his term. Moore resigned in April to run for Session’s Senate seat.

Moore’s disregard for court rulings has made him a favorite of evangelicals, who tend to be committed voters, making a low turnout primary good news for the candidate. Moore wears the disciplinary action against him as a badge of honor, arguing this makes him more trustworthy than the other candidates. “I’ve stood for traditional marriage and the acknowledgement of God, and with that, I have been reported to ethics commissions,” Moore said on the campaign trail. “It’s not what you say, it’s what you do.”

While Moore looks poised to get the most votes in the primary, it’s unlikely he’ll get the votes he needs to dodge a runoff. That theoretically gives Strange a chance to face Moore without any additional challengers, and to try to sell himself as the safe choice for Republicans—a message his supporters are already already touting. “National Democrats are itching for a fight that will embarrass President Trump,” Steven Law, who runs a major super-PAC backing Strange that has close ties to McConnell, told the New York Times.

But there’s some question as to whether Strange will even come in second and make it to the runoff. Some recent polls show him neck and neck with a third candidate, Rep. Mo Brooks. Brooks is one of the few politicians who can compete with Moore on far-right rhetoric. The Alabama congressman, a member of the staunchly conservative House Freedom Caucus, has said criticism of Jeff Sessions is motivated by the Democrats’ “war on whites.” Brooks has said the American Muslim community “would kill every homosexual in the United States of America” if it had its way (a recent Pew study found support for homosexuality in American Muslim communities is growing rapidly), and he accused undocumented immigrants of taking jobs and resources, saying, “I will do anything short of shooting them.” But unlike Moore and Strange, Brooks refused to back Trump in last year’s presidential primary, which the other two candidates in the race have used as leverage to attack Moore as not being conservative enough.

Ultimately, despite the tense race, many political observers expect little difference between the candidates when it comes to how they’d vote in the US Senate. “You would need dental floss to be able to separate the differences between them,” Marty Connors, a former chairman of the state’s Republican Party told The Economist.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate