Putin Just Held a Meeting With Manafort’s Russian Billionaire Buddy

A Kremlin gathering hosts several business figured linked to the Russia investigation.

Kremlin.ru

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The Washington Post reported Wednesday that while serving as Donald Trump’s campaign chairman, Paul Manafort offered to provide regular “private briefings” on the presidential race to Kremlin-friendly Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska. There is no evidence that Deripaska received or accepted such briefings, but, as the Post noted, Manafort’s offer “created a potential opening for Russian interests at the highest level of a US presidential campaign,” noted the Post.

Manafort’s connection to Derispaska—which goes back years—is particularly intriguing because Deripaska has long been close to Russian leader Vladimir Putin. In fact, on Thursday, Deripaska—along with several other oligarchs whose names have surfaced in relation to the Trump-Russia scandal—attended an important meeting of business leaders at the Kremlin with Putin, where before a closed door session they were treated to a short public speech from Putin touting Russia’s economic gains under his leadership.

Though such meetings happen semi-regularly, Thursday’s gathering took place as Russia gears up for its March 2018 presidential election. Russian newspaper Moskovskiy Komsomolets suggested the event was set up by Putin to signal his economic priorities for a potential fourth term to Russia’s most powerful business leaders.

Deripaska’s involvement in the Russia scandal is hardly harming his standing in Russia. (Perhaps it is even boosting his position.) But in any event, the controversy burdening Trump’s presidency is generally handled in a subdued fashion in Russia. And Deripaska and other scandal-related oligarchs are continuing on with business as usual.

Deripaska made his fortune in the aluminum business, and in the mid-1990s was denied entry to the United States due to suspected Russian mafia associations. In 2000, he was again banned from entering the US following an interview with FBI investigators. Around that time Deripaska enlisted Paul Manafort, then a veteran Republican operative and lobbyist, who finally succeeded in helping him secure a visa to the United States in 2005. The visa was later revoked in 2006. That year Deripaska reportedly hired Manafort to help bolster Putin’s image in the United States and elsewhere on a $10 million a year contract.

Also attending Thursday’s meeting with Putin was Sergey Gorkov, the chief of Russia’s state-owned development bank, Vnesheconombank. In December 2016, Gorkov met with Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner at the request of Sergey Kislyak, then Russia’s ambassador to the United States. The Senate intelligence committee said in March that it plans to question Kushner about the meeting as part of its investigation of interactions between Trump associates and Russia.

Another attendee at the Kremlin gathering was Herman Gref, the CEO of the state-controlled Sberbank PJSC, Russia’s biggest bank. In 2013, Gref organized a Moscow event with a dozen top Russian businessmen that was attended by Donald Trump, then in town for the Miss Universe pageant. (Sberbank was a co-sponsor of the contest.) The gathering was held at Moscow’s Nobu restaurant, which is partly owned by Aras Agalarov, a Russian real estate mogul who partnered with Trump on the Miss Universe event and who has become a person of interest in the Trump-Russia scandal. E-mails released by Donald Trump Jr. this summer revealed that Agalarov and his son, Russian pop star Emin, helped arrange a June 2016 meeting at Trump Tower where Trump Jr., Kushner, and Manafort, then the campaign chief, met with a Kremlin-connected Russian lawyer, whom they were told would provide them with dirt on Hillary Clinton. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate