“This Guy, Bill Cassidy, Just Lied Right To My Face.” Jimmy Kimmel Rips Into Obamacare Repeal Author

Bill Cassidy responds by going back on TV—lying even more shamelessly.


Late night host Jimmy Kimmel ripped into Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), one of the coauthors of the GOP’s latest effort to repeal and replace Obamacare, on his show Tuesday night. “This guy, Bill Cassidy, lied right to my face,” Kimmel said, encouraging his viewers to call members of Congress.

During the earlier health care debate, Cassidy received a fair bit of attention for coining what he called the Jimmy Kimmel Test, urging fellow lawmakers to protect people with preexisting conditions. Kimmel had called on Congress to do this after his son was born with congenital heart disease.

Since the summer, though, Cassidy has completely changed his mind, and is now sponsoring the GOP’s last effort to repeal Obamacare before a September 30 deadline. The bill Cassidy introduced earlier this month clearly fails his own test. It cuts billions in federal health spending and allows states to wipe out the vast majority of Obamacare’s rules protecting people with preexisting conditions (such as myself).

A clearly irate Kimmel called Cassidy out on that hypocrisy Tuesday. “[Cassidy] was on my show, and he wasn’t very honest,” Kimmel said. “It seemed like he was being honest, he got a lot of credit and attention for coming off like a rare, reasonable voice in the Republican Party when it came to health care, for coming up with something he called—and I didn’t name it this, he named it this—the Jimmy Kimmel test. Which was, in a nutshell, no family should be denied medical care, emergency or otherwise, because they can’t afford it. He agreed to that.”

Kimmel criticized Cassidy for exploiting that media coverage—and Kimmel’s own show—just to turn around and introduce legislation that went against everything he promised. “Stop using my name, because I don’t want my name on it,” Kimmel said. “There’s a new Jimmy Kimmel Test for you, it’s called the lie detector test. You’re welcome to stop by the studio and take it anytime.”

Watch Kimmel’s full monologue, which is both a father’s impassioned plea and as a surprisingly detailed policy talk (for late night television). Kimmel explains how Cassidy’s bill would allow insurance companies to once again impose lifetime caps on consumers and make health insurance unaffordable for many Americans.

Cassidy responded to Kimmel during a CNN interview Wednesday morning. “I’m sorry he does not understand,” Cassidy said. “Under Graham-Cassidy-Heller-Johnson, more people will have coverage, and we protect those with preexisting conditions.” The second part is just flat-out false. His bill would allow states to opt-out of Obamacare’s regulations that guarantee that people with preexisting conditions are charged the same rates for insurance as healthy people.

As for Cassidy’s first point—that more people will receive coverage under his plan—that’s highly dubious as well. It’s likely that tens of millions of people would lose insurance under Graham-Cassidy, since the bill offers less money in subsidies than Obamacare, ends Obamacare’s expansion of Medicaid to more low-income families, and would lower spending of traditional Medicaid by many billions by turning it into a block grant program. But it’s true we can’t say exactly how many people would likely lose insurance under the plan yet, because Cassidy and his Republican colleagues are rushing to a vote before the Congressional Budget Office has time to analyze the full impacts of the bill.

At first, it was somewhat unclear why Cassidy and his colleague Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) waited until the last minute to release their bill to the public and submit it to the CBO. But now it seems clear that Cassidy didn’t want to subject his bill to rigorous examination, and would rather try to peddle falsehoods without any scrutiny. Without a CBO report, Cassidy was able to respond to an accusation that he had lied on national television by going back on TV and lying even more shamelessly. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate