Trump Moves to End Dreamer Protections, Putting Nearly 800,000 Youths at Risk

The decision is the most significant, and harshest, that Trump has made on immigration.

Activists outside Trump Tower in August supporting the Dreamer program that President Donald Trump now plans to end.Craig Ruttle/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

President Donald Trump will end protections for nearly 800,000 young adults who came to the United States as children, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced on Tuesday. 

The undocumented immigrants affected by the decision, who are known as Dreamers, were given permission to work and study in the United States by President Barack Obama in 2012. The decision to end the Dreamer program—officially Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA—is Trump’s most significant, and harshest, decision on immigration policy. If Congress does not act and Trump ends the program, hundreds of thousands of young immigrants would lose their ability to work and study legally in the United States and become subject to possible deportation. 

Sessions said that the Trump administration would “wind down” DACA, giving Congress time to pass a bill to replace Obama’s executive actionUnder the policy announced Tuesday, the federal government will not consider any new DACA applications but will process applications it has already received. Anyone whose DACA status expires before March 5, 2018, will be given one month to apply for a two-year renewal. After that, all Dreamers whose two-year protections expire could be subject to deportation.

At Tuesday’s announcement, Sessions emphasized the rule of law, describing DACA as a “unilateral executive amnesty” that would not hold up in court. He also said that DACA recipients were taking jobs from American citizens.  

There is still the possibility that Trump will keep DACA, or prevent US Immigration and Customs Enforcement from targeting DACA recipients, after the program ends. A senior White House adviser told Politico he does not expect Trump to end DACA if Congress fails to pass a bill. Two Trump administration officials told ABC News on Tuesday that Dreamers will not be targeted if Congress fails to act. The possibility that this is all a bluff could infuriate hardline conservatives who have demanded that Trump end the program.

To qualify for DACA, Dreamers had to show that they had been in the country since 2007, arrived before they turned 16, and not committed serious crimes. The average Dreamer came to the United States at six years old and is now 25, according to a survey by University of California-San Diego professor Tom Wong.

During the presidential campaign, Trump pledged to end DACA, but he softened his position after winning the election. “The DACA situation is a very difficult thing for me, as I love these kids,” he said in February. In April, Trump told Dreamers that they should “rest easy” because his administration was focused on deporting criminals. On Friday, he repeated that “we love Dreamers.” But after months of reluctance, Trump ultimately sided with hardline advisers who oppose letting Dreamers stay in the United States. 

Trump’s decision to end DACA comes amid a threat by nine Republican state attorneys general, led by Texas’ Ken Paxton, to challenge it in court if Trump didn’t scrap it by Tuesday. If he hadn’t ended DACA and had been sued, Trump would have had to decide whether the Justice Department and Attorney General Jeff Sessions, a vocal opponent of DACA, would defend the program. Despite the devastation caused by Hurricane Harvey, Paxton said he would not push back his deadline. More than 120,000 DACA recipients live in Texas.

Ending DACA does not mean that most Dreamers will be quickly deported. The Trump administration is currently deporting about 17,000 people per month—a slower pace than under Obama—and is facing a 617,000-case backlog in the immigration court system. Unlike most undocumented immigrants apprehended at the border, Dreamers have the right to make a case for themselves in immigration court, a process that takes nearly two years on average. But Dreamers will first try to avoid being detained. For many, that could mean a return to the shadows.

Dreamers’ fears of deportation are amplified by the fact that when registering for DACA, they provided their addresses and other personal information to the government. US Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) could use that information to apprehend Dreamers more easily than other undocumented immigrants. Despite the administration’s claims that it is focused on deporting criminals, noncriminal immigration arrests have more than doubled under Trump.

As their DACA grants expire, Dreamers will continue to press Congress to pass the DREAM Act, which gave rise to the Dreamer label after being introduced in 2001. (Trump tweeted on Tuesday, “Congress, get ready to do your job – DACA!”—suggesting that he might join the call for some sort of legislative protection for Dreamers.) The bill would give DACA recipients a path to citizenship, beginning with conditional legal status in the United States. From there, they could become permanent residents if they stay in the workforce or complete two years of college or military service. The current version of the DREAM Act is backed by Democrats, as well as Republican Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Jeff Flake of Arizona and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska.

More than 70 percent of Republicans and independents favor allowing Dreamers to stay in the United States, according to a June poll by the nonpartisan Morning Consult. The timing of the expirations, which will begin to peak before the November 2018 midterm elections, is not likely to help Republicans in moderate districts. On Friday, House Speaker Paul Ryan said that he did not support ending DACA and that Congress should pass legislative protections for Dreamers. “These are kids who know no other country, who were brought here by their parents and don’t know another home,” he said in a radio interview. “And so I really do believe there that there needs to be a legislative solution.” Some Republicans have been more sharply critical of Trump’s move:

Right-wing opposition could make it difficult for Ryan to get the DREAM Act, or similar legislation, through the House. “I just don’t think we can make the mistake of assuming the opposition isn’t formidable, even if we have some conservative support,” a well-connected immigration advocate told Politico. On Sunday, Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa), one of Congress’ harshest critics of undocumented immigrants, attacked Trump on Twitter for supporting a six-month delay, saying that giving Dreamers “amnesty” would be “Republican suicide.” King followed up on Tuesday to say former DACA recipients will “make great ‘Peace Corp’ volunteers” in their home countries. 

Other Republicans appear more willing to compromise. One way try to break the impasse would be to protect Dreamers in exchange for increased enforcement along the Mexican border. Democrats and advocates for Dreamers have said they have no interest in turning Dreamers into a bargaining chip, though it’s still to early to stay if they’ll stick to that position. 

Regardless of what happens, Dreamers have already paid a price. For months, they have feared whether Trump will appease his base or keep his promise to treat Dreamers “with heart.” After Politico reported on Sunday that Trump would end DACA, Juan Escalante, a Dreamer and advocate, wrote on Twitter that thinking about losing DACA status “is not just traumatizing, it’s dehumanizing and exhausting.” That trauma, he added, is combined with the fear of knowing that Dreamers’ undocumented parents are not protected by DACA. “If we were stressed and sacred back then without DACA, under Obama,” Escalante asked, “can anyone imagine life [without] DACA under Trump?” 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate