Trump Just Screwed the Millions of Americans Addicted to Opioids

He made big promises, but a “public health emergency” won’t solve the problem, experts say.

"President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump, left, leave the East Room of the White House in Washington, after speaking on the opioid crisis."Pablo Martinez Monsivais/Associated Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Thursday, President Trump declared the nation’s opioid epidemic a public health emergency. “We can be the generation that ends the opioid epidemic,” he said. “We can do it.”

The announcement came more than two months after the president first promised to declare a national emergency, which is distinct from a public health emergency. The declaration “permit[s] the federal government to engage in activities such as assisting state and local governments, suspending or modifying certain legal requirements, and expending available funds to address” the emergency. Public health emergencies last 90 days, though they can be renewed.

The White House statement on the public health emergency declaration outlined several strategies, including expanding access to telemedicine services to address drug use and shifting resources within certain public health programs to expedite addiction recovery.

But many public health experts say the White House’s plan amounts to too little too late. “It’s a complete failure of leadership,” said Keith Humphreys, a Stanford psychiatry professor who has also worked in drug policy positions under both the Bush and Obama administrations. “Minor changes in a few programs that would barely rate an announcement by an assistant undersecretary.” 

An exclusive report in USA Today included interviews with four senior officials who work on the opioids policy and spoke on the condition of anonymity. USA Today reports that today’s declaration will allow the administration to “tap the Public Health Emergency Fund, a special fund that gives HHS maximum flexibility in a health crisis.” Bill Hall, deputy assistant secretary of Health, told USA Today that that fund currently totals $57,000.

“That’s virtually no money,” said Dara Lieberman, senior government relations manager at Trust for America’s Health and expert on public health emergencies.

USA Today also reported that “one administration official said there was no specific funding request that would accompany the emergency, and House and Senate appropriations committees said they hadn’t had any discussions with the administration on it.” The White House did not answer Mother Jones’ questions about whether any new funding would be added.

“President Trump’s declaration today amounts to a drop in the bucket compared to what the White House and Congress should be delivering to address this crisis,” said Grant Smith, deputy director of national affairs for the Drug Policy Alliance, in a press release. “We need new funding from Congress to fix our broken treatment infrastructure and boost public health capabilities to end this crisis.”

Today’s announcement comes months after the Commission on Combating Drug Addiction—a committee convened by Trump and chaired by Governor Chris Christie—issued an interim report in July, recommending an emergency declaration as a way to “empower” Trump’s “cabinet to take bold steps” and “force Congress to focus on funding and empowering the Executive Branch.”

Shortly after the commission issued the report, former Secretary of Health and Human Services Tom Price told reporters that the president was treating the crisis “as an emergency, and it is an emergency.” But the administration made no official declaration. Days after that, at his golf club in New Jersey, Trump told the press: “The opioid crisis is an emergency, and I’m saying officially right now it is an emergency.”

But until today, roughly 11 weeks later, seemingly nothing had been done to make the declaration official. Public health advocates and lawmakers were left waiting. “That freezes the field,” said Humphreys. When the President says I’m about to do this…people [wait] to see what the President proposes. A lot of time is lost with people wondering what the heck he’s up to. It’s really unhelpful.”

And last Monday, when Trump went off-script and again promised to make the emergency declaration official, it was to the shock of his administration and top agency officials. “They are not ready for this,” a public health advocate told Politico, referring to the officials at Health and Human and Services who would oversee the work.

“Based on the testimony we heard Wednesday before the House Energy & Commerce committee, several high-ranking HHS officials seemed to be familiar with very few details of the president’s plan,” added Andrew Kessler, principal at Slingshot Solutions, consulting firm for health policy. “This might be an indication that they were taken a bit by surprise when President Trump announced there would be an emergency declaration in a week’s time.”

In general, public health advocates are unsure whether—and to what degree—declaring an emergency will help tackle the opioid crisis. “The White House has to be in this for the long term,” said Kessler, insisting that sustainable, concrete plans are necessary. By design, a public health emergency has a foreseeable end point. But for the opioid crisis, it’s unclear what that point might be. Public health emergencies have “never been used for something like this,” said Lieberman of the opioid crisis. “This crisis could go on for years.”

“I don’t want to grade them yet, because the grade would be incomplete,” Kessler said. But so far, he says, “the house is on fire and they turned on the sprinkler system rather than the fire hydrant.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate