Trump Election Commission Leader Sought a Radical Change to a Key Voting Law

New documents show that Kris Kobach wanted Trump to make it much harder to register to vote.

Kris Kobach meets Donald Trump at his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, on Nov. 20, 2016. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, the vice chair of President Donald Trumpā€™s election integrity commission, urged the Trump administration to weaken a key federal voting law, according to documents released by a federal court on Thursday. Kobach called for amending the 1993 National Voter Registration Act, which requires states to offer voter registration at the DMV and other federal agencies, to allow states to require proof of citizenship in order to registerā€”a requirement that has blocked tens of thousands from the polls in Kansas. 

On November 20, 2016, Kobach met with Trump at the president-electā€™s golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey. Kobach was a top adviser to Trump on immigration and voting issues and at the time was under consideration to lead the Department of Homeland Security. As he greeted Trump, Kobach was photographed holding a white paper outlining the ā€œKobach Strategic Plan for the Next 365 Days.ā€

Though partially obscured, the document revealed a wish-list of radical policies for the Trump era that included ā€œextreme vettingā€ and tracking of ā€œall aliens from high-risk areas,ā€ reducing the ā€œintake of Syrian refugees to zero,ā€ deporting a ā€œrecord number of criminal aliens in the first year,ā€ and the ā€œrapid buildā€ of a wall along the US-Mexico border.

At the bottom of the document was a section called ā€œStop Aliens From Voting,ā€ where Kobach said he wanted to ā€œDraft Amendment to National Voter Registration Act to promote proof-of-citizenship requirements.ā€ On Thursday, in response to a lawsuit from the ACLU, a federal court ordered Kobach to release the document to the public, along with a draft of his proposed amendment. Those documents show how Kobach would alter one of the country’s most important voting rights laws by adding a new requirement that would make it much more difficult for Americans to register. (Kobach wrote to Trumpā€™s transition team the day after the election and made the same policy recommendation.)

Kobachā€™s proposal is modeled after a law in Kansas requiring citizenship documents to register to vote, such as a birth certificate, a passport, or naturalization papers. Since the law went into effect in 2013, one in seven Kansans trying to register has been prevented from doing so. Nearly half of those 30,000 people have been under the age of 30. A federal appeals court blocked a key part of the law last year, ruling that ā€œthere was an almost certain risk that thousands of otherwise qualified Kansans would be unable to vote in November.ā€ Kobach has appealed that ruling.

Kobach said the law was necessary because ā€œthe illegal registration of alien voters has become pervasive,ā€ although as secretary of state heā€™s prosecuted only two non-citizens in Kansas for voting illegally, out of 1.8 million registered voters. (Kobach also defended Trumpā€™s debunked claim that 3 to 5 million people voted illegally in the November presidential election.)

Kobach fought relentlessly to shield the document he shared with Trump from the public. In April, federal magistrate judge James Oā€™Hara rebuked Kobach for telling the court that ā€œno such document existsā€ concerning how heā€™d alter the National Voter Registration Act. Two months later, Oā€™Hara sanctioned Kobach and fined him $1,000 for ā€œdeceptive conduct and lack of candor.ā€ When Kobach appealed, another federal judge upheld the sanction and said Kobach had ā€œa patternā€ of ā€œmisleading the court.ā€

Though Vice President Mike Pence, who chairs the election commission, said the panel had ā€œno preconceived notions,ā€ the release of Kobachā€™s secret documents lends credence to fears by voting rights advocates that Kobach will use his position to exaggerate the threat of voter fraud in order to pursue policies that make it harder to vote.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate