Democrats Push to Subpoena Trump Data Firms

Reps. Jerry Nadler and Elijah Cummings want records from Cambridge Analytica and Giles-Parscale.

December 3, 2016 - New York, New York, US - Trump campaign digital director Brad Parscale in the lobby of Trump Tower on December 3, 2016.Albin Lohr-Jones/Avalon via ZUMA Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Two senior House Democrats are pushing to subpoena Cambridge Analytica and Giles-Parscale, data consulting firms that worked for the Trump campaign, after both companies were asked about and failed to deny contacts with foreign governments during the 2016 election. The Democrats want to know if the firms or the Trump campaign shared information to help the Russian government or other groups target political messages on social media or otherwise meddle in the 2016 election in a bid to help defeat Hillary Clinton.

Reps. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) and Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), the top Democrats on the House Judiciary and Oversight committees, on Thursday wrote to the Republican chairmen seeking their cooperating in subpoenaing records from these firms. The Democrats noted that on October 26, they asked Cambridge Analytica, Giles-Parscale, and three other data firms that worked for the Trump campaign to provide documents on any contacts they had with foreign governments or foreign actors such as WikiLeaks.

ā€œThree of these companiesā€”TargetPoint, Deep Root, and Data Trustā€”sent responses on the same day, using language that was nearly identical and apparently coordinated,ā€ the Democrats wrote. Each said it “had no contacts with” and did not receive “any information from a foreign government or foreign actor.” Giles-Parscale and Cambridge Analytica did not issue such a denial.

Alexander Nix, who heads Cambridge Analytica, has acknowledged that he emailed WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange last year asking for help obtaining 33,000 emails that Clinton deleted from a private email server she used while she was secretary of state. Nix is meeting with members of the House Intelligence Committee on Thursday. Cambridge Analytica, which is owned in part by Trump donor Robert Mercer and where ex-White House strategist Steve Bannon once held a board seat, did not respond to the October 26 letter, the Democrats wrote.

Brad Parscale, the Trump campaign’s former digital director and the head of San Antonio-based Giles-Parscale, did reply to the Democrats’ request. Parscale used language nearly identical to the other three firms in saying that he did ā€œnot have any firsthand knowledge of foreign interference in the 2016 elections.ā€ But Parscale’s letter did not state that his firm had no contact with foreign actors or governments, unlike the other firms. Parscale testified before the House Intelligence Committee behind closed doors last month.

Nadler and Cummings suggested in their letter that both Parscale and Cambridge may have more information. The letter asked Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, and Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.), who chairs the Oversight Committee, to subpoena the companies to force them to turn over any documents they possess detailing foreign contacts. Gowdy and Goodlatte, who have previously said they do not want to compete with ongoing investigations by the House Intelligence Committee and special counsel Robert Mueller, are expected to reject the Democrats’ request.



WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate