We Found the Woman Whose Vote Tipped Control of Virginia’s Legislature

And she had to jump through crazy hoops to do it.

Virginia House of Delegates Democratic candidate Shelly Simonds celebrates her fleeting win with Latoya Breckenridge at Simonds' victory celebration on Tuesday night.Latoya Breckenridge

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Latoya Breckenridge, a 34-year-old accountant from Newport News, Virginia, was on her way to a nail appointment on Tuesday when a friend texted her with some good news: A recount had just reversed the results for the state House of Delegates race in her district, giving Democrat Shelly Simonds a one-vote victory over the Republican incumbent and ending the GOP’s 17-year majority. Breckenridge hastily rescheduled her plans so she could attend Simonds’ victory party later that evening. “I was so happy because she could have easily given up, just being 10 votes shy of winning [prior to the recount],” she says. “It was good that she persevered.”

Breckenridge had persevered, too, going to great lengths and getting into trouble at work to make sure her vote was counted—a vote that ultimately changed the outcome of the race.

If there was ever a textbook case for the typically hyperbolic adage that every vote counts, the race in Virginia’s 94th District was it. But some votes were harder to come by than others. Breckenridge was one of almost 30 voters in the district who had to cast a provisional ballot because they did not bring identification that complied with the state’s strict voter ID guidelines, their names were not in the poll book at their assigned precinct, or they had asked for an absentee ballot but then opted to vote in person. In order for their votes to count, they then had to bring the required identification or affidavits to their local electoral board within a narrow window of time.

Breckenridge was volunteering for a local tax commissioner candidate, so she figured she wouldn’t be close to the polls on Election Day and requested an absentee ballot. When November 6 arrived and her ballot hadn’t, she opted to fill out a provisional ballot at her polling precinct. As Breckenridge watched Republican David Yancey take a 13-vote lead by the following day, she felt like she was witnessing history. “I’d never experienced a race so close in numbers, especially one that was so close to me,” she says.

The close margin sent campaign volunteers scrambling to track down provisional voters, who are often unaware of the steps required of them. Each campaign received a list of these voters in anticipation of the “provisional ballot meeting”—the validation and counting of provisional ballots, which happens only after other votes have been tallied. Anna Scanlon, Simonds’ campaign manager, had only four days to find them and get them to the Newport News registrar’s office to validate their votes.

Simonds’ field organizers made countless phone calls and visits to voters’ homes. Scanlon’s team made every effort to try to simplify the process—in one instance, she brought a notary to a voter’s home to swiftly execute a required affidavit. “Those votes would not have counted if we hadn’t gone to people’s houses and knocked on their doors,” she says. She reminded the provisional voters of the stakes. “It’s only 12 votes right now,” she told them. “Your vote could be the difference.”

Breckenridge was on the receiving end of those pleas. Simonds’ campaign inundated her with phone calls urging her to come to the Newport News registrar’s office on the morning of Monday, November 13, between 8 and 10 a.m., to validate her provisional ballot—the only time window in which those ballots would be validated. “Quite a few people contacted me—two or three representatives from Shelly’s camp,” she recalls. Scanlon, who had met Breckenridge through their work in local politics, made a personal call. “I was like, ‘Latoya, do not let me lose this,’” Scanlon says.

As it turns out, the phone calls were necessary. When Breckenridge had cast her provisional ballot, none of the precinct’s poll workers had told her that provisional ballots required follow-up. “I thought they would just take my ballot and see I hadn’t cast an absentee ballot,” she says.

Showing up in person on a Monday morning was no small ask. Breckenridge works as an accountant in Williamsburg, a roughly one-hour drive from her home in Newport News. She’d also already taken a lot of time off to work on the tax commissioner candidate’s campaign, and missing more time in such a short period irritated her boss. “I missed a lot of work, my regular paycheck work, in the time leading up to the election,” she explains. “I really needed November 7 to be the end of the election hoopla.” Breckenridge received a write-up at work for missing two hours to visit the voter registrar that Monday. But no amount of professional punishment could have dissuaded her from making the effort. “After realizing the magnitude of my vote potentially not being counted, I felt like there was too much at stake,” she says.

In the end, the efforts of Breckenridge, Scanlon’s team, and six other provisional voters paid off: Simonds picked up seven votes to Yancey’s four in the provisional ballot meeting, tightening Yancey’s lead to just 10. The margin made all the difference during the recount, which found 11 more votes for Simonds. “Everyone gets to say their one vote is the difference, but we wouldn’t have been 10 votes down going into the recount if not for the provisional ballot chase,” Scanlon says. For Breckenridge, Simonds’ one-point win helped her “to know, having actually fought for my own vote, that my vote really does count and matter.”

She had made the difference and turned a 51-49 GOP majority in the House of Delegates into a tie. That lasted for all of a day. A court decided on Wednesday that an improperly filled-out ballot that had been discarded was actually a vote for Yancey, bringing the race to a tie and setting up a drawing on December 27 to determine the winner. 

Breckenridge was disappointed, but she didn’t regret the sacrifices she made to vote. She hopes the race will help voters understand how important the electoral process is, and what’s required of people to effectively participate in it. “Somehow, we have to get the point across to people who don’t vote all the time how important it is to vote,” she says. “I’m thankful my kids got a better understanding of the process, of what it means, getting to know the people who are making decisions on your behalf, holding them accountable. It’s amazing that people don’t take the time.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate