The Election Is in 100 Days. If It Were Held Today, Trump Would Lose.

President Donald Trump walks to the Rose Garden for a press conference at the White House on July 14, 2020. Tasos Katopodis/CNP via ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

President Trump blazed into Sunday with a strong assessment of his campaign’s standing, just 100 days until November 3. 

In this alternate reality, Trump is on track for a second victory. But on Earth One, things look very different. 

National polls in recent months have given former Vice President Joe Biden a steady lead. In the last week, Biden has led by between 2 and 10 points, with most giving him a lead in the upper single digits. Hillary Clinton won the popular vote in 2016 by 2 points. But Clinton is not president because the Electoral College (a white supremacist institution) picks the president. But Trump is currently underwater in crucial swing states that he won in 2016, including Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Florida.

Donald Trump won in 2016 when traditionally blue states in the Rust Belt—Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania—turned red. This year, political realignments threaten Trump’s ability to repeat that victory. On Sunday, an NBC News/Marist poll shows Democrat Joe Biden leading Trump by five points in Arizona, a state that has gone for a Democrat only twice since 1948. There are two reasons why it might be posed to go a third time: According to the poll, voters in Arizona, a Coronavirus hot spot, trust Biden to handle the pandemic over Trump. And as federal agents are dispatched to foment conflict on the streets of American cities as part of Trump’s law-and-order campaign theme, Arizona voters said they trust Biden on race relations over Trump by a 20-point margin.

There was some qualified good news for Trump, but also news that exhibited his weakness in this moment. A higher number of Trump’s supporters in Arizona were enthusiastic about him at 74 percent compared to Biden’s 61 percent. Enthusiasm will provide insight into who shows up to vote, including during difficult situations like a pandemic. But it also shows the limits of the Trump campaign, which has catered to its base at the exclusion of appealing to a broader number of Americans. When Trump brags about the enthusiasm of his supporters, he is bragging about the faithful in a shrinking pool. 

Trump also received higher marks on the economy than Biden in Arizona. But if states are shutdown by coronavirus, the economy may not be the first order concern that it generally is during presidential elections. And the longer the economy sputters, the more Trump risks losing the public’s confidence in his economic abilities.

The Arizona poll isn’t the only bad news for the president at the 100 day mark. Its representative of a larger trend. CNN released a poll Sunday showing Biden ahead in Arizona as well as Florida and Michigan.

Florida, another state being ravaged by the pandemic, is a critical swing state and Trump has virtually no path to victory without it. In all three states, CNN found that Trump’s low numbers are the result of a lack of support from women. But Trump is certainly struggling with another problem that may prove decisive in November: a loss of support among seniors. A key constituency for Trump in 2016, this cohort has moved away from the president as he has failed to control a pandemic that threatens their lives most immediately.

But Trump does have some reason for optimism and his opponents for vigilance. Trump claims there is a “silent majority” that will reelect him. But the fear for Democrats is actually a silencing of the majority. Trump won four years ago with a minority of the popular vote, and the hurdles to voting are only growing during the pandemic. Mail-in ballots may be discarded at high rates, a shrinking number of polling locations and a lack of poll workers could result in long lines, as demonstrated by primaries. Election officials, low on resources, have just 100 days to carry out an election in a pandemic.

Political fortunes can change and polls may narrow, but as we pass the 100-day mark, Trump’s hopes for reelection increasingly rest on a majority of Americans having their will subverted once again.

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate