Trump’s 60 Minutes Stunt Proves Just One Thing: He Can’t Stand Being Interviewed by Women

The president’s post of an interview he fled backfires.

After storming out of a 60 Minutes interview with Lesley Stahl this week, President Trump has spent the last three days threatening to publish an “unedited preview” he claimed would expose Stahl as biased, rude, and politically motivated.

But on Thursday, shortly after posting a nearly 38-minute long video purporting to be just that, it became clear that Trump’s blowhard stunt had backfired. “Are you ready for some tough questions?” Stahl asks at the start of the video. The simple question appears to irritate Trump, who proceeds to condescendingly instruct Stahl to “just be fair.” 

“You’re gonna get fairness but you’re okay with some tough questions.”

“No, I’m not,” Trump shoots back. “You don’t ask Biden tough questions.”

From there, Trump is seen repeatedly lashing out as Stahl challenges the president’s outright lies. He also whines that Stahl and the rest of the media have gone easy on his Democratic challenger. But the moment Trump appeared to especially malfunction was when he was pressed for details about his policy plans—especially on health care. “You promised that there was going to be a new health care plan…Of course, we haven’t seen it,” Stahl says. “So why didn’t you develop a health plan?” 

“It is developed,” Trump replied getting visibly rattled. “It is fully developed, it’s going to be announced very soon when we see what happens with Obamacare—which is not good.” Eventually, Trump admitted to his intention to dismantle the Affordable Care Act while lying about his response to the pandemic. Finally, in one of the many times he interrupts Stahl, Trump complains: “Excuse me, Lesley, you started with me ‘Are you ready for tough questions?’ That’s no way to talk.” Then he walks out.  

For the most part, this is all familiar territory for Trump. He’s faced similar demanding questions from interviewers of mainstream news outlets, including during a sit-down with Axios’ Jonathan Swan in August. But in abruptly walking out of Stahl’s interview and posting video before it was scheduled to air, Trump yet again has reserved one of his biggest media hissy-fits for a woman. This marks his second combative appearance in less than a week, after appearing wholly unprepared for an NBC town hall with Savannah Guthrie, a former litigator, who refused to let his trademark dodges, lies, and prevarication go without the necessary grilling. “So cute,” Trump shot back at Guthrie at one point, a sarcastic response that couldn’t have played well with suburban women, a demographic Trump is losing to Biden. “Suburban women, will you please like me?” Trump asked at a rally earlier this month. “I saved your damn neighborhood, ok?”

Tonight, Trump will appear before NBC’s Kristen Welker at the final 2020 presidential debate, and he’s already falsely described as a “radical Democrat.” It’s unlikely Trump has had much time to prepare, considering his three-day obsession with Stahl and 60 Minutes. Judging by his recent meltdowns with two female journalists, we’re all but certain to see another one with Welker.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate