Trump’s Newest Expert on Vote Fraud Spent Years Boosting QAnon

The president has seized on “unsubstantiated… technically incoherent” claims.

Stephen Maturen/Getty Images

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In his eagerness to push the conspiracy that the election was stolen from him, Trump has resorted to increasingly fringe figures posing as experts. Trump most recently did this on Wednesday night, tweeting out a segment from One America News Network that interviewed key QAnon enabler Ron Watkins, who claimed that Dominion Voting Systems could be hacked and suggested that the 2020 presidential election was tampered with. 

Up until early November, Watkins, who wore a black cowboy hat for the interview, served as the administrator of 8kun, a message board owned by his father Jim Watkins. 8kun, and before that 8chan, have served as the internet home of Q, an anonymous poster who ludicrously claims to be a high-level government insider shedding light on a made-up battle between Trump and a purported pedophile ring run by liberal elites. The Watkins family is widely considered to be instrumental in the perpetuation of the far-right conspiracy theory, one that has produced multiple instances of violence, by maintaining the sites that host Q posts and vouching for the account’s identity through the sites’ transition.

Despite his proximity to the QAnon conspiracy theory, whose adherents pride themselves on waging war against a pedophile cabal, Mother Jones’ reporting found that Watkins’s father appears to have hosted domains referencing child porn, and at least some of which appear to have actually hosted child sex abuse material. 

It’s not clear what, if any, expertise Watkins has in election security. He had told the Daily Beast he was leaving his post at the site earlier this month to focus on woodworking. When asked to elaborate on claims regarding the vulnerability of Dominion voting machines, he declined, telling Mother Jones that he had “been advised not to discuss this topic.”

In his conversation with OAN, Watkins’ claims seemed to be based on reading a Dominion voting machine manual, possibly supplemented with other public records. While experts have long voiced serious concerns about the security of America’s voting systems, the existence of such vulnerabilities does not demonstrate that any manipulation or fraud occurred. Indeed, during his segment on OAN, Watkins only listed hypothetical scenarios under which voting machines could be exploited, and did not claim any actually happened.

Last week, the Department of Homeland Security’s Cyber and Infrastructure Security Agency said the election had been “the most secure in American history,” adding that “there is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.” A group of 59 of the nation’s most prominent independent voting security experts has since released a statement saying all such claims of failings are “unsubstantiated or are technically incoherent.”

OAN has established itself as a reliable source of extremely unreliable information in its willingness to routinely air stories whose sources are either entirely made up or lie in the musings of anonymous internet posters. As such, this isn’t the first time Trump has relied on fringe figures appearing on OAN with no expertise in voting systems. Last week on Twitter, he referenced a segment on the network whose “source” was just an anonymous poster on a pro-Donald Trump internet forum.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate